getting numbers

[beginers of c]

hai friends
see i have to get numbers in this manner
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ok.And also my numbers should not be larger than 9.so for each number
the condition has to be checked if it's great than 9 , then the pgm
should return 0.
for above pgm
when 3 is entered the condition should be checked,if it's
correct then i should be allowed to enter the next number.

[Richard Bos]

Re: getting numbers

beginers of c <ssksakthi@gmai l.comwrote:

hai friends

Hello, homework cheater. Be advised that I do not consider homework
cheaters to be my friends.

see i have to get numbers in this manner
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ok.And also my numbers should not be larger than 9.so for each number
the condition has to be checked if it's great than 9 , then the pgm
should return 0.
for above pgm
when 3 is entered the condition should be checked,if it's
correct then i should be allowed to enter the next number.

How about... you do your own homework? If you have made a decent
attempt, show us what you have and tell us what your problem with it is.
If you haven't had a good hard stab at it, do so now. You will never
learn if you get others to do your homework for you.

Richard

[Shadowman]

Re: getting numbers

beginers of c wrote:

hai friends
see i have to get numbers in this manner
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ok.And also my numbers should not be larger than 9.so for each number
the condition has to be checked if it's great than 9 , then the pgm
should return 0.
for above pgm
when 3 is entered the condition should be checked,if it's
correct then i should be allowed to enter the next number.
>

There's a Coors Light commercial with former Coach Bill Parcells in a
post-game press conference. An excerpt:

Q: "Coach! I have a question! I love cold Coors Light!"

Bill: "That's really not a question."

--
SM
rot13 for email

[Walter Roberson]

Re: getting numbers

In article <473B6975.477D@ mindspring.com> ,
pete <pfiland@mindsp ring.comwrote:

>santosh wrote:

>>
>In article <1195057107.667 930.145470@z24g 2000prh.googleg roups.com>,
>beginers of c <ssksakthi@gmai l.comwrote on Wednesday 14 Nov 2007 9:48
>pm:

And also my numbers should not be larger than 9.so for each number
the condition has to be checked if it's great than 9 , then the pgm
should return 0.

>This statement:
>"when 3 is entered the condition should be checked,if it's
correct then i should be allowed to enter the next number."
>Why is that statement written as though
>we don't know whether or not entering 3 satisfies that condition?
>What condition are we talking about?

The condition of not being greater than 9?

see i have to get numbers in this manner
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
ok.And also my numbers should not be larger than 9.so for each number
the condition has to be checked if it's great than 9 , then the pgm
should return 0.
for above pgm
when 3 is entered the condition should be checked,if it's
correct then i should be allowed to enter the next number.

If the numbers are supposed to be entered on a single line, as
showin "in this manner", then to "be allowed to enter the next number"
implies that after number greater than 9 is found, that the
user should not be "allowed" to enter further numbers on the same line.
That implies examining the input as it is typed, not just when the
line is completed. Unfortunately for the original poster, examining
input as it is typed in is not something that can be done with the
facilities provided by the C I/O library, and requires system-specific
extensions.

--
"Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct,
not tried it." -- Donald Knuth

[pete]

Re: getting numbers

Walter Roberson wrote:

>
In article <473B6975.477D@ mindspring.com> ,
pete <pfiland@mindsp ring.comwrote:

This statement:
"when 3 is entered the condition should be checked,if it's
correct then i should be allowed to enter the next number."
Why is that statement written as though
we don't know whether or not entering 3 satisfies that condition?
What condition are we talking about?

>
The condition of not being greater than 9?

It seems strange to discuss what a program should do,
*if* 3 turns out to be not greater than 9.

--
pete