try/catch scope question...

[barcaroller]

I have an object that throws an exception when the constructor fails. I
could construct it inside a try/catch block, but then the object is no
longer visible outside the block.

try
{
classA objA;
}
catch (...)
{
// handle the exception
}

objA.doStuff() // Wrong! Out of scope!



I do not want to move the rest of the program inside the try/catch block.
How do I work around this?

[Jerry Coffin]

Re: try/catch scope question...

In article <fcmuu1$kj0$1@a ioe.org>, barcaroller@mus ic.net says...

>
I have an object that throws an exception when the constructor fails. I
could construct it inside a try/catch block, but then the object is no
longer visible outside the block.
>
try
{
classA objA;
}
catch (...)
{
// handle the exception
}
>
objA.doStuff() // Wrong! Out of scope!
>
>
>
I do not want to move the rest of the program inside the try/catch block.
How do I work around this?

Putting the other code in the try block is generally preferred. Another
possiblity is to create the object dynamically:

classA *objA;

try {
objA = new ClassA;
}
catch (...) {
// handle the exception -- and don't use '...' in the real code.
}

objA->doStuff(); // still in scope

// and when you're done with it:

delete objA;

--
Later,
Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

[Gianni Mariani]

Re: try/catch scope question...

barcaroller wrote:

I have an object that throws an exception when the constructor fails. I
could construct it inside a try/catch block, but then the object is no
longer visible outside the block.
>
try
{
classA objA;
}
catch (...)
{
// handle the exception
}
>
objA.doStuff() // Wrong! Out of scope!
>
>
>
I do not want to move the rest of the program inside the try/catch block.
How do I work around this?

std::auto_ptr<c lassApobjA;

try
{
pobjA = std::auto_ptr<c lassA>( new ClassA );
}
catch (...)
{
// handle
}

pobjA->DoStuff();


If it must me on the stack, you can use an alloca (non-standard) see
here: http://groups.google.com/group/comp....f343b7f5b76c1?.

[red floyd]

Re: try/catch scope question...

barcaroller wrote:

I have an object that throws an exception when the constructor fails. I
could construct it inside a try/catch block, but then the object is no
longer visible outside the block.
>
try
{
classA objA;
}
catch (...)
{
// handle the exception
}
>
objA.doStuff() // Wrong! Out of scope!
>
>
>
I do not want to move the rest of the program inside the try/catch block.
How do I work around this?
>

You don't, that's the point. If the construction fails, then it's not a
valid object, so you can't doStuff() with it. You do this:

try
{
classA objA;

objA.doStuff();
}
catch (...)
{
std::cout << "OMG!!! classA constructor failed!!!!" << std::endl;
}

Alternatively, and I don't recommend this method:

std::auto_ptr<c lassAobjA( NULL );
try
{
objA.reset(new classA);
}
catch(std::bad_ alloc&)
{
// new failed
}
catch (...)
{
// classA constructor failed
}
if (objA.get())
objA->doStuff();