are there more wrong things like void main()?

[dorkz]

are there more wrong things like void main() , and <iostream.h> ?

[JosAH]

are there more wrong things like void main() , and <iostream.h> ?

You could've googled for that; it would've been faster.

kind regards,

Jos

[sicarie]

Jos -

Mind posting the Google search string you used to find that?

[dorkz]

what do you mean google? google is a searching machine, what do you mean ?

[sicarie]

what do you mean google? google is a searching machine, what do you mean ?

Jos is verbing words again, but his point is very valid - most questions on here could be answered faster and more accurately via a Google search than by posting and waiting for a Mod/Expert/Member to answer.

[JosAH]

I even made that 'googled' a link to the right place; what more could I've done to
answer the question? All you need to do is click that link; hint: 'googled' is rendered
in blue.

kind regards,

Jos

[dorkz]

aaa, yes , actually if people search on google for faults been maked like void , its faster?

[oler1s]

Trying to talk about what is wrong is hard. Breaking from the standard is wrong would be an excellent catch-all. That's what void main and <iostream.h> do, they break from the standard, either relying on something that is wrong or obsolete.

EDIT:
Yes, Google searching is faster. You aren't the first one to be asking these questions. They have been talked about in articles, written up in resources like Wikipedia, and generally answered in forum posts.

[JosAH]

aaa, yes , actually if people search on google for faults been maked like void , its faster?

yep it is

[dorkz]

someone knows very good C++ compilers?

[oler1s]

Google is your friend.

[JosAH]

Google is your friend.

:-)

kind regards,

Jos