Re: RTSP application development request
Default User escreveu:
Worldwide statistics can proof people willing or needing employment,
have much more latitude to this than otherwise.
You're *far* from being right, and perhaps only a dozen of people that
don't need a job asap are in the position you stand. I mention for
mathematical completeness.
It was not that clear enough, and if it was that, it was an ad hominen
comment, which still is non sequitur.
Default User escreveu:
Cesar Rabak wrote:
>
>
Perhaps, but I'll be not far wrong.
>
>Default User escreveu:
>You're wrong of course.
>>Nikoh wrote:
>>>
>>>On 3 Feb, 16:59, "Malcolm McLean" <regniz...@btin ternet.comwrote :
>>>>"Nikoh" <i...@dnastudio s.itwrote in message
>>>>>My company looking for a coder to modify vlc media player...
>>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>>If you call your software engineers "coders" the it is
>>>>unsurprisin g that no-oner wants to work for you.
>>>Ok, then my company looking for a "software engineers"; you happy
>>>now?
>>Nobody wants to work for someone who willfully violates the
>>topicality of the newsgroup either.
>>>
>>>On 3 Feb, 16:59, "Malcolm McLean" <regniz...@btin ternet.comwrote :
>>>>"Nikoh" <i...@dnastudio s.itwrote in message
>>>>>My company looking for a coder to modify vlc media player...
>>>> ^^^^^^^
>>>>If you call your software engineers "coders" the it is
>>>>unsurprisin g that no-oner wants to work for you.
>>>Ok, then my company looking for a "software engineers"; you happy
>>>now?
>>Nobody wants to work for someone who willfully violates the
>>topicality of the newsgroup either.
Perhaps, but I'll be not far wrong.
have much more latitude to this than otherwise.
You're *far* from being right, and perhaps only a dozen of people that
don't need a job asap are in the position you stand. I mention for
mathematical completeness.
>
>Why is that calling someone that writes code not courteous?
>
>
What are you talking about? I clearly stated that I was discussing
someone who violates topicality.
>>If you can't show common courtesy when you're
>>looking for an employee, why would anyone expect you to show it once
>>they're hired?
>>>
>>looking for an employee, why would anyone expect you to show it once
>>they're hired?
>>>
>
What are you talking about? I clearly stated that I was discussing
someone who violates topicality.
comment, which still is non sequitur.
Comment