Is there anything that says that if you virtually inherit from one
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
-
-
Re: virtual inheritance
Noah Roberts wrote:No, if not if I understand your question. You can (and typically do)Is there anything that says that if you virtually inherit from one
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
>
have a mix of virtual and non-virtual inheritance.
-
Re: virtual inheritance
Noah Roberts wrote:What? Can you ask your question with an example?Is there anything that says that if you virtually inherit from one
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
Your question can be answered ad infinitum and public inheritance is
not the same as virtual public inheritance, either.
I see a misconception here. Inheritance does not mean append or attach.
It means transpose or redesign from scratch. How the redesign takes
place depends on what member functions are virtual and which ones are
virtually overridden or even overloaded.
Also, a ctor and dtor can never be inherited, but a d~tor's vituality
is inherited.
Note that composition is far more common than public inheritance -
which is a strict relationship. If you are trying to circumvent
inheritance of virtual member functions, chances are that the base
class should be a member. Hence the term: composition.
Peter
Comment
-
Re: virtual inheritance
Noah Roberts wrote:What are you actually asking - whether virtual iheritance is carriedIs there anything that says that if you virtually inherit from one
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
over??? e.g.
struct Base{};
struct Derived1 : virtual Base{};
struct Derived2 : Derived{};
Derived 2 automatically inherits virtually from Base, as this is
implied because Derived1 does. Derived2 though, does not automatically
inherit virtually from Derived1.
see C++ std 98 par. 10.1/4
Regards,
Werner
Comment
-
Re: virtual inheritance
Noah Roberts wrote:No. Only methods with the "virtual"-keyword are virtual inherited. AllIs there anything that says that if you virtually inherit from one
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
>
other methods are normal inherited.
-Martin
Comment
-
Re: virtual inheritance
Ron Natalie wrote:Yes, you understand my question. I'm getting very strange results INoah Roberts wrote:No, if not if I understand your question. You can (and typically do)Is there anything that says that if you virtually inherit from one
class you have to virtually inherit from anything you inherit from?
have a mix of virtual and non-virtual inheritance.
hadn't gotten until I tried virtual inheritance on one class. It is
affecting a different parent. I didn't think virtual inheritance
required that but it was worth asking because I have no idea what is
going on.
Thread on that is titled "Anyone seen anything like this" or something
like that. I'll be trying to reproduce it in a simple program today if
I can.
Comment
Comment