unsure how to implement MFC CArray with class

[Mike Stenzler]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..


Attila Feher wrote:
[snip][color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> WW aka Attila <----------- hmmmm, interesting....[/color][/color]
>
> And not Atilla.[/color]
[snip][color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> WW aka Attila <----------- again, interesting....[/color][/color]
>
> And again, not Atilla.[/color]
[snip][color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> WW aka Attila <------------ well, I guess you see my point...[/color][/color]
>
> And again, not Atilla.[/color]
[snip][color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >> Attila aka WW <------ ahh, you must be thinking about this[/color][/color]
>
> And again, not Atilla.[/color]
[snip]
[color=blue]
> Nope. I am Attila. Learn to read.[/color]


[OBNOXIOUS REFERENCE TO TROLLING BEING SNIPPED SNIPPED]
[color=blue]
> --
> Attila aka WW[/color]

Ahh! That one I like! I am wrong, you are right. Your name *is* Attila.
I need new glasses and a more precise pattern matching algorithm.

Mike

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

Mike Stenzler wrote:[color=blue]
> Hey, I thought I was in your kill file![/color]

I don't killfile weasels. I like to see their weasely attack thinking I
don't see it. It settles any remaining issues whether I was right to thibk
they are weasels or not.
[color=blue]
> Attila Feher wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> Mike Stenzler wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> kinda teasing him since he signs his posts as "WW aka Atilla".[/color]
>> --
>> WW aka Attila <----------- hmmmm, interesting....[/color][/color]

And not Atilla.
[color=blue]
> WW wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> Mike Wahler wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> [sigh]
>>>
>>> PLONK[/color]
>>
>> Et tu, Mike?
>>
>> --
>> WW aka Attila <----------- again, interesting....[/color][/color]


And again, not Atilla.
[color=blue]
> WW wrote:
> [snip][color=green]
>> You have time to post that f*cking bullsh*t but you did not have
>> time to press F1 and look at your helpfile for vector.
>> Congratulations . You must be fun to work with!
>>
>> [TROLLING SNIPPED]
>>
>> PLONK
>>
>> --
>> WW aka Attila <------------ well, I guess you see my point...[/color][/color]


WOW! And again, not Atilla.
[color=blue]
> Attila Feher wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> [SNIP]
>> http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame43.html
>>
>> --
>> Attila aka WW <------ ahh, you must be thinking about this[/color][/color]


And yet again, not Atilla.
[color=blue]
> What is it about this that you are unwilling to let go of?
>
> Read your own posts above and give it up - YOU ARE WRONG.[/color]

Nope. I am Attila. Learn to read.

[TROLLING SNIPPED]

--
WW aka Attila

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

Mike Stenzler wrote:
[SNIP][color=blue]
> Ahh! That one I like! I am wrong, you are right. Your name *is*
> Attila. I need new glasses and a more precise pattern matching
> algorithm.[/color]

Or probably a minute of rest when you realize that if someone who knows more
than you do tells you something he might indeed be trying to give the best
help he can. And stop ranting. BTW the signatures are like as they are,
because from work I cannot use home email address from home I will not set
the work email address. And I do not want people to get mixed up why does
WW answer something they wrote to Attila. Around my world it is called
courtesy and that is not something to be ridiculed. I apparently do not
know your world.

--
WW aka Attila

[Default User]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

Mike Stenzler wrote:

[bullshit]


Yep, I knowed this was coming.


*plonk*




Brian Rodenborn

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

Default User:

One troll less. It seems someone hates when his own words get back on
him...

--
WW aka Attila

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

WW wrote:[color=blue]
> Default User:
>
> One troll less. It seems someone hates when his own words get back on
> him...[/color]

Got it? I have two email addresses. One from work, one from home. Do not
forget to also killfile this one. You make a good service for me.

--
WW aka Attila

[Default User]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

WW wrote:[color=blue]
>
> WW wrote:[color=green]
> > Default User:
> >
> > One troll less. It seems someone hates when his own words get back on
> > him...[/color]
>
> Got it? I have two email addresses. One from work, one from home. Do not
> forget to also killfile this one. You make a good service for me.[/color]


Again I ask, who are you talking to? It would seem to be me, but I can't
figure in reference to what. I haven't plonked you, nor do I intend to.



Brian Rodenborn

[Default User]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

WW wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Default User:
>
> One troll less. It seems someone hates when his own words get back on
> him...[/color]


Ummm, are you talking to me?



Brian Rodenborn

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

Default User wrote:[color=blue]
> WW wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> WW wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Default User:
>>>
>>> One troll less. It seems someone hates when his own words get back
>>> on him...[/color]
>>
>> Got it? I have two email addresses. One from work, one from home.
>> Do not forget to also killfile this one. You make a good service
>> for me.[/color]
>
>
> Again I ask, who are you talking to? It would seem to be me, but I
> can't figure in reference to what. I haven't plonked you, nor do I
> intend to.[/color]

Well then. That is said. I could have asked like you. But then it would
not be me. And I did look at the thread, and it was an answer to one of my
posts. And then I looked at the source - and according to that it was an
answer to my post. So today is the day. When I am plonked but not and when
my new headache pill stops working and migrene is back in full power. To be
(and have migrene) or not to be (and according to Murphy, possibly still
have migrene).

My Apollo Gs.

--
WW aka Attila

[osmium]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

WW writes:
[color=blue]
> Well then. That is said. I could have asked like you. But then it would
> not be me. And I did look at the thread, and it was an answer to one of[/color]
my[color=blue]
> posts. And then I looked at the source - and according to that it was an
> answer to my post. So today is the day. When I am plonked but not and[/color]
when[color=blue]
> my new headache pill stops working and migrene is back in full power. To[/color]
be[color=blue]
> (and have migrene) or not to be (and according to Murphy, possibly still
> have migrene).[/color]

Migraines are a bitch! Gingko biloba got rid of my migraines after a great
number of doctors failed in finding a cure. You would have to take it
several weeks to see if it worked.
--
Osmium

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

osmium wrote:[color=blue]
> Migraines are a bitch! Gingko biloba got rid of my migraines after a
> great number of doctors failed in finding a cure. You would have to
> take it several weeks to see if it worked.[/color]

ABSOLUTELY BLATANTLY OT
I take Forever Gingko Plus, one per day.

--
WW aka Attila

[Default User]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

WW wrote:
[color=blue]
> Well then. That is said. I could have asked like you. But then it would
> not be me. And I did look at the thread, and it was an answer to one of my
> posts. And then I looked at the source - and according to that it was an
> answer to my post.[/color]



It most certainly was NOT an answer to one of your posts. Go back and
read again, see what the attribution line is.

In fact, I'll post the complete message for you:

Mike Stenzler wrote:

[bullshit]


Yep, I knowed this was coming.


*plonk*




Brian Rodenborn


Do you see your name ANYWHERE in that?


You have a real problem with reading for comprehension. There's no rule
the WW needs to respond to every post on the newsgroup, or even every
thread. I suggest posting about 75% less, but make sure you actually
READ the stuff you are replying to. This shit gets annoying.




Brian Rodenborn

[WW]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

Default User wrote:[color=blue]
> WW wrote:
> You have a real problem with reading for comprehension. There's no
> rule
> the WW needs to respond to every post on the newsgroup, or even every
> thread. I suggest posting about 75% less, but make sure you actually
> READ the stuff you are replying to. This shit gets annoying.[/color]

I have read the post source. And in my reading of the headers (references)
as well as in the way OutLook lined it up it looked like you did post it to
me.

Last line of my post was this: "My Apollo Gs." Let me translate it for
you: My apologies.

BTW if I will need advice from you on how to live my life, I will certainly
ask you. Now I did not. And your concern about me is also annoying.
Especially when you answer with a rant to a post finished by an apology.
BTW that said you can start to apply your own rule: read what you answer to.

--
WW aka Attila

[Default User]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

WW wrote:
[color=blue]
> I have read the post source. And in my reading of the headers (references)
> as well as in the way OutLook lined it up it looked like you did post it to
> me.[/color]

That's a problem with your newsreader or news server then, because I
replied directly to Stenzler's screed. Actually *reading* the post would
have made that clear.
[color=blue]
> Last line of my post was this: "My Apollo Gs." Let me translate it for
> you: My apologies.[/color]

It's preferable to post in English in the first place.
[color=blue]
> BTW if I will need advice from you on how to live my life, I will certainly
> ask you.[/color]

I don't give a damn about your life, I give a damn about your anticts on
this newsgroup.
[color=blue]
> And your concern about me is also annoying.[/color]

I'm not the one that had a coniption when he misinterpreted a plonking.
I think you're a lot more hung on me than the other way around.
[color=blue]
> Especially when you answer with a rant to a post finished by an apology.[/color]

A weasel-worded apology implying that somehow the whole thing wasn't
your fault.
[color=blue]
> BTW that said you can start to apply your own rule: read what you answer to.[/color]

What the hell does that mean? I misinterpreted nothing, I just can't
stand your usual "misread then overreact then offer a lame apology"
screed.



Brian Rodenborn

[Dave Vandervies]

Re: [OT, link] ... now the truth about bullies..

In article <3F7F22B0.391A1 FB8@company.com >,
Default User <first.last@com pany.com> wrote:[color=blue]
>WW wrote:
>[color=green]
>> I have read the post source. And in my reading of the headers (references)
>> as well as in the way OutLook lined it up it looked like you did post it to
>> me.[/color]
>
>That's a problem with your newsreader or news server then, because I
>replied directly to Stenzler's screed. Actually *reading* the post would
>have made that clear.[/color]

My newsreader or newsserver appears to have the same problem, then,
it's just handling it differently: trn shows the post of yours that
started this subthread as an orphaned post in the thread, and a look at
the headers indicates that the References header is truncated.

Since it's showing up in two different places, it'd be more reasonable
to suspect a problem in the posting software or swerver on your end.
'Tmight be worth looking into in your Copious Free Time.


dave

--
Dave Vandervies dj3vande@csclub .uwaterloo.ca
Hey, I can beat him on the Impressive But Useless certificates thing.
I have a PhD.
--Dan Holdsworth in the scary devil monastery