Fundamental question about visibility

[jeffc]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility


"Gavin Deane" <deane_gavin@ho tmail.com> wrote in message
news:6d8002d0.0 309260256.3253b 40d@posting.goo gle.com...[color=blue]
>
> I don't know why you have a problem with attention to detail. It is an
> extremely important quality in a computer programmer, since the
> computer has to follow precisely what you told it to do, even if you
> meant something slightly different.[/color]

Oh. I didn't realize that Gavin. Maybe that's why none of my programs have
ever compiled. In the future I will try to remember to be more detail
oriented if I expect success in computers. Thank you.

[jeffc]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility


"Noah Roberts" <nroberts@donte mailme.com> wrote in message
news:3F73DBF6.3 060307@dontemai lme.com...[color=blue]
>
> You yourself, in a disagreement with me, claimed C++ supports the OO
> paradigm. If this is true it must also support the terminology. If
> indeed C++ is multiparadigm (and it of course is) then this is not a
> problem.[/color]

His robotic responses change depending from which side of the fence he's
currently arguing.

[jeffc]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility


"Attila Feher" <attila.feher@l mf.ericsson.se> wrote in message
news:bl0ic0$3jp $1@newstree.wis e.edt.ericsson. se...[color=blue][color=green]
> > One can only imagine you hiding your dictionaries under your
> > mattress, and reading them late at night with a flashlight.[/color]
>
> Get a life.[/color]

In case you couldn't translate that sentence, that's what it meant.

[WW]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility

jeffc wrote:[color=blue]
> "Noah Roberts" <nroberts@donte mailme.com> wrote in message
> news:3F73DBF6.3 060307@dontemai lme.com...[color=green]
>>
>> You yourself, in a disagreement with me, claimed C++ supports the OO
>> paradigm. If this is true it must also support the terminology. If
>> indeed C++ is multiparadigm (and it of course is) then this is not a
>> problem.[/color]
>
> His robotic responses change depending from which side of the fence
> he's currently arguing.[/color]

Stop trolling!

--
WW aka Attila

[WW]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility

jeffc wrote:[color=blue]
> "Attila Feher" <attila.feher@l mf.ericsson.se> wrote in message
> news:bl0ic0$3jp $1@newstree.wis e.edt.ericsson. se...[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> One can only imagine you hiding your dictionaries under your
>>> mattress, and reading them late at night with a flashlight.[/color]
>>
>> Get a life.[/color]
>
> In case you couldn't translate that sentence, that's what it meant.[/color]

Stop trolling!

--
WW aka Attila

[Noah Roberts]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility

WW wrote:[color=blue]
> jeffc wrote:[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>>In case you couldn't translate that sentence, that's what it meant.[/color][/color]

[color=blue]
> Stop trolling!
>[/color]

I really must say now that this has become incredibly annoying. There
are at least 10 messages in which "Stop trolling!" is the only thing you
say spanning multiple threads. There really isn't any point in it.

NR

[WW]

Re: Fundamental question about visibility

Noah Roberts wrote:[color=blue]
> WW wrote:[color=green]
>> jeffc wrote:[/color]
>[color=green][color=darkred]
>>> In case you couldn't translate that sentence, that's what it meant.[/color][/color]
>[color=green]
>> Stop trolling![/color]
>
> I really must say now that this has become incredibly annoying. There
> are at least 10 messages in which "Stop trolling!" is the only thing
> you say spanning multiple threads. There really isn't any point in
> it.[/color]

Any other, than to stop JEFFC from TROLLING in ALL of thsoe THREADS. Which
is just as annoying. So if you want to help, stop him from trolling.

--
WW aka Attila