Unique file name generation

[White Wolf]

Re: Unique file name generation

Default User wrote:[color=blue]
> Don't use man pages in place of the C++ standard.[/color]

When did I say I do?

--
WW aka Attila

[Default User]

Re: Unique file name generation

White Wolf wrote:[color=blue]
>
> Default User wrote:[color=green]
> > Don't use man pages in place of the C++ standard.[/color]
>
> When did I say I do?[/color]


When did I say you said you did?


You were the one who started bleating about standards and man pages. I'm
reiterating, in case you didn't get the message, that the man pages
ain't the standard.




Brian Rodenborn

[White Wolf]

Re: Unique file name generation

Default User wrote:[color=blue]
> White Wolf wrote:[color=green]
>>
>> Default User wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Don't use man pages in place of the C++ standard.[/color]
>>
>> When did I say I do?[/color]
>
> When did I say you said you did?[/color]

You have answered my post.
[color=blue]
> You were the one who started bleating about standards and man pages.
> I'm reiterating, in case you didn't get the message, that the man
> pages ain't the standard.[/color]

Yes. And I have never ever stated that they are. What I have said is that
I find it wrong for a man page to dedicate a function deprecated (while it
is not in its corresponding standard).

BTW do not get personal with me. Remarks like your bleating show only your
cluelessness and arrogance. They have no argumentative or technical (or any
kind of positive) value whatsoever.

--
WW aka Attila

[Default User]

Re: Unique file name generation

White Wolf wrote:
[color=blue]
> Yes. And I have never ever stated that they are. What I have said is that
> I find it wrong for a man page to dedicate a function deprecated (while it
> is not in its corresponding standard).[/color]

You still don't get it.
[color=blue]
> BTW do not get personal with me.[/color]

It's been my experience that people who complain about people getting
personal never seem to mind do so when it suits their purpose.
[color=blue]
> Remarks like your bleating show only your cluelessness and arrogance.[/color]

Like so.




Brian Rodenborn

[White Wolf]

Re: Unique file name generation

Default User wrote:[color=blue]
> White Wolf wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Yes. And I have never ever stated that they are. What I have said
>> is that I find it wrong for a man page to dedicate a function
>> deprecated (while it is not in its corresponding standard).[/color]
>
> You still don't get it.[/color]

I have got it my friend. But it seems you love to argue. You have stated I
do not know the difference. I have asked you for proof - if I have ever
said anything like that. You started to get personal but gave no proof. I
have answered and you have got even more personal.

Well, I am not going to try to find out why are you doing this, but I also
suggest that you don't try to find out what I think or know either. And
especially not state it in public as if I had anything to do with it. Since
it seems your understanding of my words is limited, I suggest you rather ask
if something is unclear than go into some sort of ranting against a
statement I have never made.
[color=blue][color=green]
>> BTW do not get personal with me.[/color]
>
> It's been my experience that people who complain about people getting
> personal never seem to mind do so when it suits their purpose.[/color]

Yeah. Is it so? Maybe it is time for you to start respecting people, not
gettinf personal and they won't get personal with you.
[color=blue][color=green]
>> Remarks like your bleating show only your cluelessness and arrogance.[/color]
>
> Like so.[/color]

Yes, like so. This was a general remark. ("you" as "one" is a general
subject, at least that is what I have learnt in school).

--
WW aka Attila

[Gianni Mariani]

Re: Unique file name generation

White Wolf wrote:[color=blue]
> Default User wrote:
>[color=green]
>>White Wolf wrote:
>>[/color][/color]

.... love fest snipped

Please fellas, go get married.

We don't really need any of this here.

Regards
G

[Attila Feher]

Re: Unique file name generation

Gianni Mariani wrote:
[SNIP][color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>> I think there is a security vulnerability with tmpnam.
>>>
>>> Standard or not, it is highly reccomended NOT to add security
>>> vulnerabilities . I'd have to agree with the GNU guys on this - (if
>>> my sentence above is true).[/color]
>>
>>
>> Sorry to say but this is spreading FUD.[/color]
>
> If you know better, please elaborate.[/color]

You claim there is a security risk. It was not me who have accused a
standard library function to be a security risk. It is not my job to prove
anything. It is yours.
[color=blue]
> If you do not know that there are[color=green]
>> any security problems with a function do not say so.[/color]
>
> It takes a few seconds to see.[/color]

OK. Then take that few seconds to see it and share it with us. So far you
are spreading FUD with zero support from facts.
[color=blue]
> Google is your friend.[/color]

Yes. However it is not my job to support you argument. It is yours.

--
Attila aka WW

[Gianni Mariani]

Re: Unique file name generation

Attila Feher wrote:
....[color=blue][color=green]
>>Google is your friend.[/color]
>
>
> Yes. However it is not my job to support you argument. It is yours.[/color]

If you have the impression I wish to *argue* you are mistaken.

I'm not interested in taking this further.

[Attila Feher]

Re: Unique file name generation

Gianni Mariani wrote:[color=blue]
> Attila Feher wrote:[color=green]
>> Yes. However it is not my job to support you argument. It is yours.[/color]
>
> If you have the impression I wish to *argue* you are mistaken.
>
> I'm not interested in taking this further.[/color]

No proof, bail out. That is also a way to do it.

--
Attila aka WW

[Default User]

Re: Unique file name generation

Gianni Mariani wrote:[color=blue]
>
> White Wolf wrote:[color=green]
> > Default User wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>White Wolf wrote:
> >>[/color][/color]
>
> ... love fest snipped[/color]


Yeah, really. WW has his panties in a wad, and has decided to go into
super, "I'm playing language lawyer and not going to listen to anything
you say except to pick small things that I can use to make it seem like
you are an ignorant fool blah blah."

Well, I don't need to play that game, so I'll do the best thing can,
ignore his ravings. He can stalk my posts all he wants, won't make a bit
of difference to me.



Brian Rodenborn