classname::classname a type ?

[Oliver S.]

There are compilers that allow sizeof(classnam e::classname) as a
synonym to sizeof(classnam e); has anyone found something about this
in the ISO-std ? I doubt that this is legal.

[White Wolf]

Re: classname::clas sname a type ?

Oliver S. wrote:[color=blue]
> There are compilers that allow sizeof(classnam e::classname) as a
> synonym to sizeof(classnam e); has anyone found something about this
> in the ISO-std ? I doubt that this is legal.[/color]

All I can imagine is the size of a function pointer of the constructor,
which would make sense here. But according to the standard the constructor
does not have a name and its address cannot be taken (I was told so)... so
it all makes no sense to me.

--
WW aka Attila