Const iterator, private struct.

[swhite]

Hi,

Sorry, not very clear from the title but wasn't sure what to call it.
I was experimenting with the following in GCC 4.0.1 and didn't achieve
what I expected. I was trying to keep the internal class private, to
prevent creation, but also in the hope it might achieve something like
when you use "class <foo>;" to early declare to allow pointer passing,
but cannot access contents.

Also I passed out a const iterator containing this object expecting it
to make what it was iterating over const, but gcc allows me to change
it.

Just wondered what I should actually expect (found behaviour was
correct?) and anything close (if possible) to roughly achieve what I
was expecting.

#include <map>
#include <string>

class A
{
private:
struct Test
{
int a;
int b;
};
typedef std::map<std::s tring,Test *Test2;

public:
typedef const Test2::const_it erator Test3;

private:
Test2 m_test;

public:
Test3 foo () { return m_test.end (); }
};

int main ()
{
A a;
A::Test3 test = a.foo ();
// Accesses object of private type...
// Didn't want, hoping for compiler error
int b = (*test).second->a;
(*test).second->a = 1; // modified const...
return 0;
}

Regards,
Simon

[Pierre Barbier de Reuille]

Re: Const iterator, private struct.

swhite wrote:

Hi,
>
Sorry, not very clear from the title but wasn't sure what to call it.
I was experimenting with the following in GCC 4.0.1 and didn't achieve
what I expected. I was trying to keep the internal class private, to
prevent creation, but also in the hope it might achieve something like
when you use "class <foo>;" to early declare to allow pointer passing,
but cannot access contents.
>
Also I passed out a const iterator containing this object expecting it
to make what it was iterating over const, but gcc allows me to change
it.
>
Just wondered what I should actually expect (found behaviour was
correct?) and anything close (if possible) to roughly achieve what I
was expecting.
>
#include <map>
#include <string>
>
class A
{
private:
struct Test
{
int a;
int b;
};
typedef std::map<std::s tring,Test *Test2;
>
public:
typedef const Test2::const_it erator Test3;
>
private:
Test2 m_test;
>
public:
Test3 foo () { return m_test.end (); }
};
>
int main ()
{
A a;
A::Test3 test = a.foo ();
// Accesses object of private type...
// Didn't want, hoping for compiler error
int b = (*test).second->a;
(*test).second->a = 1; // modified const...
return 0;
}
>
Regards,
Simon
>

Well, the reason is const_iterator does not allow you to modify the
structure of the container, but it says nothing with regards to the
object themselves. To achieve what you want you need to do that:

#include <string>
#include <map>

class A
{
public:
struct Test
{
int a;
int b;
};
typedef std::map<std::s tring,const Test *Test2;
typedef const Test2::const_it erator Test3;

Test3 foo () { return m_test.begin (); }
void add( const std::string& s, const Test& t )
{
m_test[ s ] = new Test( t );
}

void modify( const std::string& s, const Test& nt )
{
Test* t = const_cast<Test *>( m_test[ s ] );
*t = nt;
}
private:

Test2 m_test;

};

int main ()
{
A a;
A::Test t = {1,2};
a.add( "toto", t );
A::Test3 test = a.foo ();
// Accesses object of private type...
// Didn't want, hoping for compiler error
t.b = 1;
a.modify( "toto", t );
int b = test->second->a;
test->second->a = 1; // modified const...
return 0;
}

Pierre