Re: bit copying
pete wrote:[color=blue]
> CBFalconer wrote:[color=green]
> >[/color][/color]
.... snip ...[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> > The operators are || and &&,
> > unless you #include <iso646.h>, when
> > the macros 'or' and 'and' expand to those anyway.[/color]
>
> I'm having a very hard time parsing that sentence.
>
> You're saying that when you #include <iso646.h>,
> then || and && aren't the operators, but that when you
> don't #include <iso646.h>, then they are the operators.[/color]
When you include iso646.h, you have the option of using the word
'and' to signify &&, and the word 'or' to signify ||. Note
option. && and || still work as advertised.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer@yah oo.com) (cbfalconer@wor ldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net> USE worldnet address!
pete wrote:[color=blue]
> CBFalconer wrote:[color=green]
> >[/color][/color]
.... snip ...[color=blue][color=green]
> >
> > The operators are || and &&,
> > unless you #include <iso646.h>, when
> > the macros 'or' and 'and' expand to those anyway.[/color]
>
> I'm having a very hard time parsing that sentence.
>
> You're saying that when you #include <iso646.h>,
> then || and && aren't the operators, but that when you
> don't #include <iso646.h>, then they are the operators.[/color]
When you include iso646.h, you have the option of using the word
'and' to signify &&, and the word 'or' to signify ||. Note
option. && and || still work as advertised.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer@yah oo.com) (cbfalconer@wor ldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net> USE worldnet address!
Comment