Double getters

[Krice]

I'm wondering is there a way to avoid having "double" getters:

class A
{
Compo *_C;
public:
int Get_From_C();
....

int A::Get_From_C() { return _C->Get_Something( ); }

This problem gets worse if A is derived from a base
class and only some derived classes have Compo class.
Then you need to write a virtual getter if some routine
requires the base handle.

[mlimber]

Re: Double getters

Krice wrote:[color=blue]
> I'm wondering is there a way to avoid having "double" getters:
>
> class A
> {
> Compo *_C;[/color]

First identifiers starting with an underscore and a capital letter are
reserved for the implementation. Change _C to _c or c_ or something
else.
[color=blue]
> public:
> int Get_From_C();
> ...
>
> int A::Get_From_C() { return _C->Get_Something( ); }
>
> This problem gets worse if A is derived from a base
> class and only some derived classes have Compo class.
> Then you need to write a virtual getter if some routine
> requires the base handle.[/color]

That's just the price of encapsulation (see
http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit....html#faq-7.4),
though you might improve things by refactoring your design. Compare
this article:

http://www.gotw.ca/publications/mill05.htm

Cheers! --M