stl: what member function need to exist in class for list implementation

[gerg]

for a class such as:

class A
{
public:
A();
///// leave everything missing for purpose of example

public: /// member vars

wchar* szString; // set to NULL
someobj* pObj; // set to NULL on default constructor
};

what would the minimum member functions you would want to implement for
a list such as?:

std::list<A> A_List;

I would expect: =, A(const A&), A() and ~A().

I hope this question is plain enough.

[Bob Hairgrove]

Re: stl: what member function need to exist in class for list implementation

On 13 Jan 2006 15:34:32 -0800, "gerg" <jacklig@gmail. com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>for a class such as:
>
>class A
>{
>public:
> A();
>///// leave everything missing for purpose of example
>
>public: /// member vars
>
>wchar* szString; // set to NULL
>someobj* pObj; // set to NULL on default constructor
>};
>
>what would the minimum member functions you would want to implement for
>a list such as?:
>
>std::list<A> A_List;
>
>I would expect: =, A(const A&), A() and ~A().[/color]

As a bare minimum, yes. But it's not enough if you want to initialize
the pointer members in the constructor as well, e.g. when you call
list<A>::push_b ack(A(...)).

--
Bob Hairgrove
NoSpamPlease@Ho me.com