initializing array using pointer

[arun]

suppose i have a pointer to an array of integers.can i initialize each
member of the array using pointers?plz explain

[saurabh]

Re: initializing array using pointer

Hi,

You can assign values to array elements using pointer. Look at the code
below:

main ()
{
int array[3];
int *pArry, count;

pArry = array;

*pArry = 1; pArry++;
*pArry =2; pArry++;
*pArry =3;

for (count = 0; count <3; count++)
printf ("array[%d] contains %d\r\n",count, array[count]);

}

Is this what you want.

Regards,
Saurabh.

arun wrote:[color=blue]
> suppose i have a pointer to an array of integers.can i initialize each
> member of the array using pointers?plz explain[/color]

[slebetman@yahoo.com]

Re: initializing array using pointer

arun wrote:[color=blue]
> suppose i have a pointer to an array of integers.can i initialize each
> member of the array using pointers?plz explain[/color]

You mean something like:

#define ARR_MAX 100

int arr[ARR_MAX];
int *myptr;
int i;

myptr = arr;
for(i=0; i<ARR_MAX; i++) {
*myptr = 0;
myptr++;
}

[Johny]

Re: initializing array using pointer

Question not clear.

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

OT, Google boilerplate (was: Re: initializing array using pointer)

Johny <inform.inn@gma il.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Question not clear.[/color]

Neither was your response:

It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions of the text
you are replying to. To do this using Google groups, please follow the
instructions below, penned by Keith Thompson:

If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cybers pace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate (was: Re: initializing array using pointer)

In article <dnmncm$duq$1@c hessie.cirr.com >,
Christopher Benson-Manica <ataru@nospam.c yberspace.org> wrote:[color=blue]
>Johny <inform.inn@gma il.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Question not clear.[/color]
>
>Neither was your response:
>
>It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions of the text
>you are replying to. To do this using Google groups, please follow the
>instructions below, penned by Keith Thompson:
>
>If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
>the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
>"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
>"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.[/color]

You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath. They'll never get
it. And I'll tell you why.

Imagine that there's a mouse - and the mouse is the Usenet. You and I can
see that it is a mouse and we behave accordingly. But now there is a class
of users (we'll call them "googlers") that are wearing these funny weird
glasses that make them see not a mouse, but an elephant. Seeing an
elephant (i.e., the Usenet as a web page), they also behave accordingly.
And no amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them that it's not
an elephant - that it is only a mouse.

To make this more clear, to a googler, it doesn't make any sense to "quote"
(whatever the heck that is...), in fact, to do so would be absurd, when all
the rest of the articles in the thread are right there in front of their
faces (just as clear as the trunk on that mouse, er, elephant). And no
amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them not to believe what
they see. The point is you can *never* convince someone that what they see
isn't reality. The only way you can address the problem is to help them
fix their eyesight (or help them remove their funny glasses).

[Richard Bos]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate (was: Re: initializing array using pointer)

gazelle@yin.int eraccess.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:
[color=blue]
> In article <dnmncm$duq$1@c hessie.cirr.com >,
> Christopher Benson-Manica <ataru@nospam.c yberspace.org> wrote:[color=green]
> >Johny <inform.inn@gma il.com> wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Question not clear.[/color]
> >
> >Neither was your response:
> >
> >It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions of the text
> >you are replying to. To do this using Google groups, please follow the
> >instructions below, penned by Keith Thompson:
> >
> >If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
> >the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
> >"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
> >"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.[/color]
>
> You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath. They'll never get it.[/color]

Neither will you, but if we stop trying your kind will have won and all
will be barbarity.

Richard

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate (was: Re: initializing array using pointer)

In article <439ef48c.43559 4684@news.xs4al l.nl>,
Richard Bos <rlb@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl> wrote:[color=blue]
>gazelle@yin.in teraccess.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:
>[color=green]
>> In article <dnmncm$duq$1@c hessie.cirr.com >,
>> Christopher Benson-Manica <ataru@nospam.c yberspace.org> wrote:[color=darkred]
>> >Johny <inform.inn@gma il.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Question not clear.
>> >
>> >Neither was your response:
>> >
>> >It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions of the
>> >text you are replying to. To do this using Google groups, please
>> >follow the instructions below, penned by Keith Thompson:
>> >
>> >If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
>> >the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
>> >"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
>> >"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.[/color]
>>
>> You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath. They'll never
>> get it.[/color]
>
>Neither will you, but if we stop trying your kind will have won and all
>will be barbarity.
>
>Richard[/color]

To borrow a line from a fellow troll:

You say that like it would be a Bad Thing.

[Skarmander]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate

Richard Bos wrote:[color=blue]
> gazelle@yin.int eraccess.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:
>[color=green]
>> In article <dnmncm$duq$1@c hessie.cirr.com >,
>> Christopher Benson-Manica <ataru@nospam.c yberspace.org> wrote:[color=darkred]
>>> Johny <inform.inn@gma il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Question not clear.
>>> Neither was your response:
>>>
>>> It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions of the text
>>> you are replying to. To do this using Google groups, please follow the
>>> instructions below, penned by Keith Thompson:
>>>
>>> If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
>>> the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
>>> "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
>>> "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.[/color]
>> You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath. They'll never get it.[/color]
>
> Neither will you, but if we stop trying your kind will have won and all
> will be barbarity.
>[/color]
You already stopped trying. Please, DFTT, no matter what. Every reply is a loss.

S.

[Default User]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate (was: Re: initializing array using pointer)

Richard Bos wrote:
[color=blue]
> gazelle@yin.int eraccess.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:[/color]


[google reply]
[color=blue][color=green]
> > You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath. They'll
> > never get it.[/color]
>
> Neither will you, but if we stop trying your kind will have won and
> all will be barbarity.[/color]

And of course, Kenny is wrong (what a surprise). Many of the people
have learned to quote properly via the instructions given to them.
Many, if not most, do so because the Google interface is so archane
that they couldn't figure out how to do so.

With any luck the idjits at Google will switch that around.


Brian

[Chuck F.]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate

Richard Bos wrote:[color=blue]
> gazelle@yin.int eraccess.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote:[color=green]
>> Christopher Benson-Manica <ataru@nospam.c yberspace.org> wrote:
>>[/color][/color]
.... snip ...[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
>>>
>>> It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions
>>> of the text you are replying to. To do this using Google
>>> groups, please follow the instructions below, penned by Keith
>>> Thompson:
>>>
>>> "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't
>>> use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article.
>>> Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click
>>> on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers."[/color]
>>
>> You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath.
>> They'll never get it.[/color]
>
> Neither will you, but if we stop trying your kind will have won
> and all will be barbarity.[/color]

And experience has shown that a non-vanishing fraction of googlers
are capable of learning. Similarly, experience has shown that
Google itself is incapable of creating a usable interface. They
have been plaguing Usenet with this abortion for about a year.

--
Read about the Sony stealthware that is a security leak, phones
home, and is generally illegal in most parts of the world. Also
the apparent connivance of the various security software firms.

http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/11/sonys_drm_rootk.html

[Mark McIntyre]

Re: initializing array using pointer

On 13 Dec 2005 01:56:25 -0800, in comp.lang.c , "arun"
<arkoshy@gmail. com> wrote:
[color=blue]
>suppose i have a pointer to an array of integers.can i initialize each
>member of the array using pointers?plz explain[/color]

No. Initialisation is something that happens when you declare the
variable.

You probably mean assign. In which case sure, just iterate over the
array, pointing to each element and assigning it a value.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[Kenny McCormack]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate

In article <UoydnXiRH48riA LenZ2dnUVZ_s6dn Z2d@maineline.n et>,
Chuck F. <cbfalconer@wor ldnet.att.net> wrote:
....[color=blue]
>And experience has shown that a non-vanishing fraction of googlers
>are capable of learning.[/color]

I'm not clear on what you mean by a "non-vanishing fraction". Are you
agreeing or disagreeing with my point?

In any case, always remember that isolated exceptions do not disprove
generalities (except in the sphere of mathematics).
[color=blue]
>Similarly, experience has shown that Google itself is incapable of
>creating a usable interface. They have been plaguing Usenet with this
>abortion for about a year.[/color]

Agreed.

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate

Chuck F. <cbfalconer@yah oo.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> And experience has shown that a non-vanishing fraction of googlers
> are capable of learning. Similarly, experience has shown that
> Google itself is incapable of creating a usable interface. They
> have been plaguing Usenet with this abortion for about a year.[/color]

Speaking (jestingly) of plaguing Usenet, you've been missing for some
time, haven't you? Your contributions have been missed, at least by
this poster. Glad to see you back.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cybers pace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

[Keith Thompson]

Re: OT, Google boilerplate (was: Re: initializing array usingpointer)

Christopher Benson-Manica <ataru@nospam.c yberspace.org> writes:[color=blue]
> Johny <inform.inn@gma il.com> wrote:
>[color=green]
>> Question not clear.[/color]
>
> Neither was your response:
>
> It is proper Usenet etiquette to include the relevant portions of the text
> you are replying to. To do this using Google groups, please follow the
> instructions below, penned by Keith Thompson:
>
> If you want to post a followup via groups.google.c om, don't use
> the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
> "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
> "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.[/color]

Or just read <http://cfaj.freeshell. org/google/>.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keit h) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.