static member

[Lowen]

It's my understanding a static member variable will be one instance among
all objects created from it, and static member functions only access static
variables. When coding, I am still not sure how to decide if to declare a
member of a class "static"? Is there some tips on this? thanks!

[Ian]

Re: static member

Lowen wrote:[color=blue]
> It's my understanding a static member variable will be one instance among
> all objects created from it, and static member functions only access static
> variables. When coding, I am still not sure how to decide if to declare a
> member of a class "static"? Is there some tips on this? thanks!
>[/color]
I think you have answered your own question!

If the variable is pertinent to the current instance of the class, it a
normal member, if it its value is shared by all instances of the class,
it is static.

Ian

[JKop]

Re: static member

Ian posted:
[color=blue]
> Lowen wrote:[color=green]
>> It's my understanding a static member variable will be one instance
>> among all objects created from it, and static member functions only
>> access static variables. When coding, I am still not sure how to
>> decide if to declare a member of a class "static"? Is there some tips
>> on this? thanks!
>>[/color]
> I think you have answered your own question!
>
> If the variable is pertinent to the current instance of the class, it a
> normal member, if it its value is shared by all instances of the class,
> it is static.
>
> Ian[/color]


Every dog has a unique name, every dog has a unique age. But all dog's are
of the same order "Mammal", so this is not a unique bit of info for each
individual dog:

class Dog
{
public:
char Name[15];
unsigned short int Age;

static char Order[15];
};

char Dog::Order[15] = "Mammal";


-JKop

[puppet_sock@hotmail.com]

Re: static member

"Lowen" <Lowenb@import. com> wrote in message news:<bhCqc.315 4$fF3.73619@bgt nsc05-news.ops.worldn et.att.net>...[color=blue]
> It's my understanding a static member variable will be one instance among
> all objects created from it, and static member functions only access static
> variables. When coding, I am still not sure how to decide if to declare a
> member of a class "static"? Is there some tips on this? thanks![/color]

One of my instructors had this "trick" for deciding when to use
static and when to use non-static.

Think of the class definition as a factory, and the objects (the
instances of the class) as the cars produced in that factory.

If the information is about the car (the instance) then it should
be "per car" and a non-static member.

If the information is about the factory (the class) and not about
individual cars, then it should be static.

So, to say it another way, the static members should be information
that applies to the entire set of objects, no matter how many there
are, and the non-static should be information about inidividual
objects.

So, for example, a count of cars the factory had produced so far
would be static. The mileage on an individual car would be non-static.
Socks