Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffers

[Default User]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s

Alan Balmer wrote:
[color=blue]
> Also, it's been written in the newsgroup many times, and should be
> obvious to anyone who has spent any time observing the group before
> posting to it.[/color]


And who has a modicum of sense, which leaves Trollsdale in the dust.




Brian Rodenborn

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s

Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
[color=blue]
> E. Robert Tisdale wrote:
>[color=green]
>>Perhaps.
>>But where is it written that either the comp.lang.c or comp.lang.c++
>>newsgroup is "dedicated to portable programming"?[/color]
>
> In the FAQ ;-)
>
> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9[/color]

I can't find either dedicated or portable in that FAQ.

[E. Robert Tisdale]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s

Alan Balmer wrote:
[color=blue]
> Also, it's been written in the newsgroup many times[/color]

Please cite and quote the article which asserts that,

"The comp.lang.c newsgroup is dedicated to portable programming".
[color=blue]
> and should be obvious to anyone who has spent any time
> observing the group before posting to it.[/color]

I have been "observing" almost as long as these newsgroups have existed
and it is *not* obvious to me.

[CBFalconer]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s

Alan Balmer wrote:[color=blue]
> <technews@kanga roologic.com> wrote:[color=green]
> >"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.Robert.Tisda le@jpl.nasa.gov > wrote
> >[color=darkred]
> >> Perhaps. But where is it written that either the comp.lang.c or
> >> comp.lang.c++ newsgroup is "dedicated to portable programming"?[/color]
> >
> >In the FAQ ;-)
> >
> > http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9
> >[/color]
> Also, it's been written in the newsgroup many times, and should
> be obvious to anyone who has spent any time observing the group
> before posting to it.[/color]

I suggest ignoring Trollsdale entirely unless he performs his
trick of misquoting others or his alleged 'advice' is obviously
bad and misleading.

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer@yah oo.com) (cbfalconer@wor ldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home .att.net> USE worldnet address!

[Jonathan Turkanis]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s


"E. Robert Tisdale" <E.Robert.Tisda le@jpl.nasa.gov > wrote in message
news:4008630D.8 060506@jpl.nasa .gov...[color=blue]
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>[color=green]
> > E. Robert Tisdale wrote:
> >[color=darkred]
> >>Perhaps.
> >>But where is it written that either the comp.lang.c or[/color][/color][/color]
comp.lang.c++[color=blue][color=green][color=darkred]
> >>newsgroup is "dedicated to portable programming"?[/color]
> >
> > In the FAQ ;-)
> >
> > http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9[/color]
>
> I can't find either dedicated or portable in that FAQ.
>[/color]

Sorry! My mistake. I should have pointed you to:

http://www.dictionary.com

Jonathan

[Severian]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:17:49 -0800, "E. Robert Tisdale"
<E.Robert.Tisda le@jpl.nasa.gov > wrote:
[color=blue]
>Jonathan Turkanis wrote:[color=green]
>> E. Robert Tisdale wrote:[color=darkred]
>>>Perhaps.
>>>But where is it written that either the comp.lang.c or comp.lang.c++
>>>newsgroup is "dedicated to portable programming"?[/color]
>>
>> In the FAQ ;-)
>>
>> http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9[/color]
>
>I can't find either dedicated or portable in that FAQ.[/color]

As tiresome as I find it to read your posts, I cannot imagine how
tiresome it must be to produce them.

- Sev

[August Derleth]

Re: Slow performance with new 3GHz Machine using FlushFileBuffer s

E. Robert Tisdale wrote:
[color=blue]
> Alan Balmer wrote:[color=green]
>> and should be obvious to anyone who has spent any time
>> observing the group before posting to it.[/color]
>
>
> I have been "observing" almost as long as these newsgroups have existed
> and it is *not* obvious to me.
>[/color]

Which speaks volumes about you.

--
My address is yvoregnevna gjragl-guerr gjb-gubhfnaq guerr ng lnubb qbg pbz
Note: Rot13 and convert spelled-out numbers to numerical equivalents.