thread join question

[Eps]

I understand that if I want to wait for a thread to stop then I can use
the join menthod.

If I have more than one thread, and I want to wait until they have all
stopped, what is the best way of doing this ?.



Thread1.Join();
Thread2.Join();
Thread3.Join();
Thread4.Join();

If I do the above are there any performance issues depending on whether
certain threads take longer than others ?.

Any help appreciated.

--
Eps

[Marc Vangrieken]

Re: thread join question

Hi,

Take a look at this post: http://www.thescripts.com/forum/thread504107.html

There's no problem with Joining all threads sequentually because
you're waiting for all of them.. Using WaitAll() with waithandles
would give you exactly the same performance (afaik).

Kind regards,

Marc
http:\\vangriek en.wordpress.co m

On 30 dec, 17:18, Eps <e...@mailinato r.comwrote:

I understand that if I want to wait for a thread to stop then I can use
the join menthod.
>
If I have more than one thread, and I want to wait until they have all
stopped, what is the best way of doing this ?.
>
Thread1.Join();
Thread2.Join();
Thread3.Join();
Thread4.Join();
>
If I do the above are there any performance issues depending on whether
certain threads take longer than others ?.
>
Any help appreciated.
>
--
Eps