about delegate

[Tony Johansson]

Hello!

When I define a class the default access modifier is internal.

So if I just write
class MyTest
{
. . .
}
this definition has internal as access modifier

but if I define a delegate as
delegete returnType SomeName (someArgumentLi st);
Is it the same here that internal is the default access modifier if none is
given

//Tony

[Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]]

Re: about delegate

Tony,

Yes, that is the case.


--
- Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
- mvp@spam.guard. caspershouse.co m

"Tony Johansson" <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote in message
news:Fzi3j.956$ R_4.712@newsb.t elia.net...

Hello!
>
When I define a class the default access modifier is internal.
>
So if I just write
class MyTest
{
. . .
}
this definition has internal as access modifier
>
but if I define a delegate as
delegete returnType SomeName (someArgumentLi st);
Is it the same here that internal is the default access modifier if none
is given
>
//Tony
>

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: about delegate

Tony Johansson <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

this definition has internal as access modifier
>
but if I define a delegate as
delegete returnType SomeName (someArgumentLi st);
Is it the same here that internal is the default access modifier if none is
given

If it's declared outside another type, that's true.
If it's declared within another type, it's private by default. (The
same is true for other types too.)

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

[Tony Johansson]

Re: about delegate

Hello!

When I write this delegete returnType SomeName (someArgumentLi st);
I call it to define a delegate but you call it to declare.
In C++ it was a big difference between define a class and to declare a
class.

In my exemple here with the delegate I assume you agree with me
that to define and declare is the same.

It's just a matter of taste.

//Tony

"Jon Skeet [C# MVP]" <skeet@pobox.co mskrev i meddelandet
news:MPG.21b7d0 7f1caef6a677@ms news.microsoft. com...

Tony Johansson <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

>this definition has internal as access modifier
>>
>but if I define a delegate as
>delegete returnType SomeName (someArgumentLi st);
>Is it the same here that internal is the default access modifier if none
>is
>given

>
If it's declared outside another type, that's true.
If it's declared within another type, it's private by default. (The
same is true for other types too.)
>
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: about delegate

Tony Johansson <johansson.ande rsson@telia.com wrote:

When I write this delegete returnType SomeName (someArgumentLi st);
I call it to define a delegate but you call it to declare.

Well, it's declaring a delegate type.

In C++ it was a big difference between define a class and to declare a
class.

In my exemple here with the delegate I assume you agree with me
that to define and declare is the same.

Well, it depends what you use "declare" and "define" to mean. I tend to
use "declaratio n" because that's what the spec does. For instance:

"A delegate-declaration is a type-declaration (§9.6) that declares a
new delegate type."

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK: http://iterativetraining.co.uk