LSP Implementation for bandwidth restriction

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • salman

    #1

    LSP Implementation for bandwidth restriction

    Hi
    I am working on a trading application server, normally 25-30 clients
    connect to server in a time. And server continuously sending trading
    data to clients.
    I want to restrict server that, it should not send over 4KB/sec data
    to a client. I found LSP (Layered Service Provider) that can do this
    but I am unable to find any source of LSP to use in my .Net
    application.

    Please help me and send me a sample LSP implementation, if someone
    have.

    Ali

  • Peter Duniho

    #2
    Re: LSP Implementation for bandwidth restriction

    salman wrote:
    [...]
    I want to restrict server that, it should not send over 4KB/sec data
    to a client. I found LSP (Layered Service Provider) that can do this
    but I am unable to find any source of LSP to use in my .Net
    application.
    While I suppose an LSP could be used to solve the problem, it's not
    necessary. You can easily implement all of the functionality you need
    within the server itself.

    What was wrong with the suggestions we already provided to you regarding
    this question?

    Pete

    Comment

    • salman

      #3
      Re: LSP Implementation for bandwidth restriction

      Ok Peter I will try this solutions.

      Salman Ali

      On Sep 21, 12:17 pm, Peter Duniho <NpOeStPe...@Nn OwSlPiAnMk.com>
      wrote:
      salman wrote:
      [...]
      I want to restrict server that, it should not send over 4KB/sec data
      to a client. I found LSP (Layered Service Provider) that can do this
      but I am unable to find any source of LSP to use in my .Net
      application.
      >
      While I suppose an LSP could be used to solve the problem, it's not
      necessary. You can easily implement all of the functionality you need
      within the server itself.
      >
      What was wrong with the suggestions we already provided to you regarding
      this question?
      >
      Pete

      Comment

      Working...