.NET Framework v2.0

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • elena

    .NET Framework v2.0

    Hi, All
    I need advice about upgrating VS .NET
    I have VS .NET 2003 v1.1 installed on Windows XP.
    I have projectes developed in C#, C++ for desktop applications and C# and
    ..NET VB for mobile devices targeting Windows CE 4.1
    My question is can i upgrate development environment and to make sure i
    still be able to support existing projects?
    Are .NET Framework v2.0 and .NET CF v2.0 is a solution ?
    Is it free download ?

    Please, advice
  • Daniel

    #2
    Re: .NET Framework v2.0

    Hi

    Projects developed in vs.net 2003 when opned in vs2005 automatically upgrade
    and works well from my experience of it. I have has no problems with a 1.1
    to 2.0 upgrade just remmeber your user requirements change as they will need
    2.0 (i dont think they do for webapps tho).

    So yuo should have no problems in changing the environment. Best way
    forward, set up a test machine, copy your projects and try it out on that
    machine.

    "elena" <elena@discussi ons.microsoft.c omwrote in message
    news:CBF72278-0954-462C-9B86-AB8B951A4E42@mi crosoft.com...
    Hi, All
    I need advice about upgrating VS .NET
    I have VS .NET 2003 v1.1 installed on Windows XP.
    I have projectes developed in C#, C++ for desktop applications and C# and
    .NET VB for mobile devices targeting Windows CE 4.1
    My question is can i upgrate development environment and to make sure i
    still be able to support existing projects?
    Are .NET Framework v2.0 and .NET CF v2.0 is a solution ?
    Is it free download ?
    >
    Please, advice

    Comment

    • elena

      #3
      Re: .NET Framework v2.0

      Hi, Daniel
      I am sorry, i don't understand, you say if i install v2.0 it will upgrate my
      VS .NET 2003 to 2005?
      I found on Microsoft site v2.0 and v3.0 are they can be applyed to VS .NET
      2003?



      "Daniel" wrote:
      Hi
      >
      Projects developed in vs.net 2003 when opned in vs2005 automatically upgrade
      and works well from my experience of it. I have has no problems with a 1.1
      to 2.0 upgrade just remmeber your user requirements change as they will need
      2.0 (i dont think they do for webapps tho).
      >
      So yuo should have no problems in changing the environment. Best way
      forward, set up a test machine, copy your projects and try it out on that
      machine.
      >
      "elena" <elena@discussi ons.microsoft.c omwrote in message
      news:CBF72278-0954-462C-9B86-AB8B951A4E42@mi crosoft.com...
      Hi, All
      I need advice about upgrating VS .NET
      I have VS .NET 2003 v1.1 installed on Windows XP.
      I have projectes developed in C#, C++ for desktop applications and C# and
      .NET VB for mobile devices targeting Windows CE 4.1
      My question is can i upgrate development environment and to make sure i
      still be able to support existing projects?
      Are .NET Framework v2.0 and .NET CF v2.0 is a solution ?
      Is it free download ?

      Please, advice
      >
      >
      >

      Comment

      • Marc Gravell

        #4
        Re: .NET Framework v2.0

        The framework versions and the versions of VS are completely separate.

        Framework 1.1 can live side by side with 2.0
        VS 2003 [1.1] can live side by side with 2005 [2.0]

        The frameworks are free. Visual Studio is a marketed product, but the
        Express Editions of 2005 are free.

        No, upgrading to 2.0 will not upgrade to 2005.

        Yes, you can still support existing projects - just keep 2003 on the machine
        and you can continue to develop 1.1 projects.

        You cannot develop for 1.1 in VS 2005, neither can you develop for 2.0 in VS
        2003.

        Marc


        Comment

        • elena

          #5
          Re: .NET Framework v2.0

          Marc, thank you
          Ok, i install v2.0 on previously installed VS NET 2003 v1.1 and then i can
          select in what version to run Application?

          "Marc Gravell" wrote:
          The framework versions and the versions of VS are completely separate.
          >
          Framework 1.1 can live side by side with 2.0
          VS 2003 [1.1] can live side by side with 2005 [2.0]
          >
          The frameworks are free. Visual Studio is a marketed product, but the
          Express Editions of 2005 are free.
          >
          No, upgrading to 2.0 will not upgrade to 2005.
          >
          Yes, you can still support existing projects - just keep 2003 on the machine
          and you can continue to develop 1.1 projects.
          >
          You cannot develop for 1.1 in VS 2005, neither can you develop for 2.0 in VS
          2003.
          >
          Marc
          >
          >
          >

          Comment

          • Peter Thornqvist

            #6
            Re: .NET Framework v2.0

            Ok, i install v2.0 on previously installed VS NET 2003 v1.1 and then i can
            select in what version to run Application?
            No, VS2003 only creates .Net 1.1 apps and VS2005 only creates .Net 2.0
            apps. If you have VS2003 and VS2005 on the same machine, you can choose
            which .Net version your project should be develop for.

            If you open a .Net 1.1 app in VS2005, it will automatically upgrade the app
            to use .Net 2.0 (it will prompt you first). After that, you can no longer
            open the project in VS2003 (at least not without some manual editing of the
            project files).

            I hope that clarifies the issue for you

            --

            Regards, Peter


            Comment

            • Daniel

              #7
              Re: .NET Framework v2.0

              Yep, i was saying what Peter said, except i must have said it in a more
              confusing manner.

              I said:

              "Projects developed in vs.net 2003 when opned in vs2005 automatically
              upgrade "

              And somehow you took that as:

              "I am sorry, i don't understand, you say if i install v2.0 it will upgrate
              my
              VS .NET 2003 to 2005?"

              I think the confusion is that i assumed your question was, will your
              projects still work in Vis 2005 which is what i thought you were upgrading
              too as you look to use .net 2.0


              "Peter Thornqvist" <peter.tornqvis t@gmail.comwrot e in message
              news:%236XE4$95 GHA.2208@TK2MSF TNGP04.phx.gbl. ..
              >Ok, i install v2.0 on previously installed VS NET 2003 v1.1 and then i
              >can
              >select in what version to run Application?
              >
              No, VS2003 only creates .Net 1.1 apps and VS2005 only creates .Net 2.0
              apps. If you have VS2003 and VS2005 on the same machine, you can choose
              which .Net version your project should be develop for.
              >
              If you open a .Net 1.1 app in VS2005, it will automatically upgrade the
              app to use .Net 2.0 (it will prompt you first). After that, you can no
              longer open the project in VS2003 (at least not without some manual
              editing of the project files).
              >
              I hope that clarifies the issue for you
              >
              --
              >
              Regards, Peter
              >

              Comment

              • Jon Skeet [C# MVP]

                #8
                Re: .NET Framework v2.0

                Marc Gravell <marc.gravell@g mail.comwrote:

                <snip>
                You cannot develop for 1.1 in VS 2005, neither can you develop for 2.0 in VS
                2003.
                Agreed on the latter, but not the former:



                <quote>
                MSBuild Extras =3F Toolkit for .NET 1.1 =3FMSBee=3F is an addition to MSBuild
                that allows developers to build managed applications using Visual
                Studio 2005 projects that target .NET 1.1.
                </quote>

                --
                Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
                http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
                If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

                Comment

                • Marc Gravell

                  #9
                  Re: .NET Framework v2.0

                  Thankyou Jon; good catch!

                  I haven't looked at that yet; does anybody know how well it integrates,
                  e.g. into the designers to stop them using inappropriate features /
                  classes? Obviously the manually written code will have to avoid these,
                  but designers are harder to bypass...

                  Marc

                  Comment

                  • Marc Gravell

                    #10
                    Re: .NET Framework v2.0

                    Thankyou Jon; good catch!

                    I haven't looked at that yet; does anybody know how well it integrates,
                    e.g. into the designers to stop them using inappropriate features /
                    classes? Obviously the manually written code will have to avoid these,
                    but designers are harder to bypass...

                    Marc

                    Comment

                    • deepak.programming@gmail.com

                      #11
                      Re: .NET Framework v2.0

                      Hi,
                      You can run both the applications developed in vs2003 and vs2005
                      without any conversion in .net frameword 2.0. There are little issues
                      regarding those like u have to configure the iis accrodingly for .net
                      2.0. So u don't have a need to convert it to 2005 at random. Take your
                      time to convert those and till then these applications can run
                      successfully in vs2005. Also please don't take help from vs2005
                      converter as it results in a number of new problems (I've faced them
                      earliar).

                      Please rectify me if i am wrong.

                      Marc Gravell wrote:
                      Thankyou Jon; good catch!
                      >
                      I haven't looked at that yet; does anybody know how well it integrates,
                      e.g. into the designers to stop them using inappropriate features /
                      classes? Obviously the manually written code will have to avoid these,
                      but designers are harder to bypass...
                      >
                      Marc

                      Comment

                      • Peter Thornqvist

                        #12
                        Re: .NET Framework v2.0

                        Daniel, you did say the same as me but it seemed elena didn't catch on, so I
                        tried to explain it as simply as I could :)

                        --
                        Regards, Peter


                        Comment

                        • Jon Skeet [C# MVP]

                          #13
                          Re: .NET Framework v2.0

                          <deepak.program ming@gmail.comw rote:
                          You can run both the applications developed in vs2003 and vs2005
                          without any conversion in .net frameword 2.0. There are little issues
                          regarding those like u have to configure the iis accrodingly for .net
                          2.0. So u don't have a need to convert it to 2005 at random. Take your
                          time to convert those and till then these applications can run
                          successfully in vs2005. Also please don't take help from vs2005
                          converter as it results in a number of new problems (I've faced them
                          earliar).
                          >
                          Please rectify me if i am wrong.
                          That's largely right, but there are some incompatibiliti es between 1.1
                          and 2.0 which may cause some applications to fail - sometimes subtly. I
                          prefer to run applications designed for 1.1 with 1.1, rather than
                          *only* having 2.0 installed.

                          --
                          Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>
                          http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog: http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
                          If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

                          Comment

                          Working...