Casting using "as" question

[Dave]

What is the benefit of using "as" vs the other?

HttpWebRequest myReq
= (HttpWebRequest )WebRequest.Cre ate("http://www.contoso.com/");

vs.

HttpWebRequest myReq = WebRequest.Crea te("http://www.contoso.com/") as
HttpWebRequest;

Based on the MS documenation "The as operator is like a cast except that it
yields null on conversion failure instead of raising an exception. "

I've read some internal coding standards that state "Use the as operator to
defensively cast to a type", but I don't quite get the benefit of this and
want an outside opinion.

Thanks.

[Angel J. Hernández M.]

Re: Casting using "as&quo t; question

It returns an object of the resulting cast (if successful) or null. So you
can use the object afterwards and it doesn't raise an exception (just like
the MS documentation states).

Best regards,


--
Angel J. Hernández M.
MCP - MCAD - MCSD - MCDBA
Microsoft MVP ASP/ASP.NET

http://groups.msn.com/desarrolladoresmiranda

http://www.consein.com

"Dave" <Dave@discussio ns.microsoft.co m> wrote in message
news:F656E135-D958-4E13-9DA7-EC6EF79F6C63@mi crosoft.com...[color=blue]
> What is the benefit of using "as" vs the other?
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq
> = (HttpWebRequest )WebRequest.Cre ate("http://www.contoso.com/");
>
> vs.
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq = WebRequest.Crea te("http://www.contoso.com/") as
> HttpWebRequest;
>
> Based on the MS documenation "The as operator is like a cast except that
> it
> yields null on conversion failure instead of raising an exception. "
>
> I've read some internal coding standards that state "Use the as operator
> to
> defensively cast to a type", but I don't quite get the benefit of this and
> want an outside opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>[/color]

[Thaddaeus Parker]

Re: Casting using &quot;as&quo t; question

Using "as" allows for the "graceful" failure of casting one object to
another.
As per your examples:[color=blue]
> HttpWebRequest myReq
> = (HttpWebRequest )WebRequest.Cre ate("http://www.contoso.com/"); --This
> will cause an exception of InvalidCastExce ption if the system can cast the
> web request as a httpwebrequest. But if we were to use "as"
>
> vs.
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq = WebRequest.Crea te("http://www.contoso.com/") as
> HttpWebRequest; -- this will capture the possible exception and return a
> null allowing for your code to be execute as normal.[/color]

Think of "as" as being
public static void as(ref object a, object b, Type someType){
try{
a = (someType)b;
}catch{ a = null;}
}
}
In some cases using "as" is much safer than attempting to forceably cast one
type to another type.

Thaddaeus

"Dave" <Dave@discussio ns.microsoft.co m> wrote in message
news:F656E135-D958-4E13-9DA7-EC6EF79F6C63@mi crosoft.com...[color=blue]
> What is the benefit of using "as" vs the other?
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq
> = (HttpWebRequest )WebRequest.Cre ate("http://www.contoso.com/");
>
> vs.
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq = WebRequest.Crea te("http://www.contoso.com/") as
> HttpWebRequest;
>
> Based on the MS documenation "The as operator is like a cast except that
> it
> yields null on conversion failure instead of raising an exception. "
>
> I've read some internal coding standards that state "Use the as operator
> to
> defensively cast to a type", but I don't quite get the benefit of this and
> want an outside opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>[/color]

[Hans Kesting]

Re: Casting using &quot;as&quo t; question

> What is the benefit of using "as" vs the other?[color=blue]
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq
> = (HttpWebRequest )WebRequest.Cre ate("http://www.contoso.com/");
>
> vs.
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq = WebRequest.Crea te("http://www.contoso.com/") as
> HttpWebRequest;
>
> Based on the MS documenation "The as operator is like a cast except that it
> yields null on conversion failure instead of raising an exception. "
>
> I've read some internal coding standards that state "Use the as operator to
> defensively cast to a type", but I don't quite get the benefit of this and
> want an outside opinion.
>
> Thanks.[/color]

And an extra remark:

unlike a direct cast, you can't use "as" on value types
("theobj as int"), because it can return null, which value-types can't
handle.

Hans Kesting

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: Casting using &quot;as&quo t; question

Hans Kesting wrote:
[color=blue]
> And an extra remark:
>
> unlike a direct cast, you can't use "as" on value types
> ("theobj as int"), because it can return null, which value-types can't
> handle.[/color]

That's not strictly true under .NET 2.0. Nullable<T> types are still
value types, but can be used with "as":

using System;

class Test
{
static void Main()
{
object o = 5;
int? x = o as int?;
}
}

(Note that if you remove the last ? in the program, you'll get a
compiler error CS0077 which has an inaccurate description - I've
reported it to MS).

Jon

[John Murray]

Re: Casting using &quot;as&quo t; question

Internally, they are two different CIL instructions -- castclass
(straight cast) and isinst (as.) The primary difference, as noted
already is that the castclass instruction generates an exception when no
cast exists while the isinst just places a null value on the evaluation
stack.

The implication is that if you know -- or expect your type to always be
castable then the castclass instruction provides some runtime safety in
case an unexpected value comes through -- and you dont suffer the
penalty of spinning up an exception. If, on the other hand, you are not
sure what the type will be, and you want to handle it gracefully, then
isinst allows you to avoid the performance penalties of an exception if
the class cannot be cast.



Dave wrote:[color=blue]
> What is the benefit of using "as" vs the other?
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq
> = (HttpWebRequest )WebRequest.Cre ate("http://www.contoso.com/");
>
> vs.
>
> HttpWebRequest myReq = WebRequest.Crea te("http://www.contoso.com/") as
> HttpWebRequest;
>
> Based on the MS documenation "The as operator is like a cast except that it
> yields null on conversion failure instead of raising an exception. "
>
> I've read some internal coding standards that state "Use the as operator to
> defensively cast to a type", but I don't quite get the benefit of this and
> want an outside opinion.
>
> Thanks.
>[/color]