const Vs static

[Ant]

Hi,

I'm having trouble trying to define the difference between declaring a field
in a class const or static. i've noted that when referencing them from the
class that a const is symbolized with a field symbol & a static has a blue
box. What is the difference? What is the blue box? Has it got to do with
scope or get/setability?

Thanks for your thoughts in advance

Ant

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: const Vs static

Ant <Ant@discussion s.microsoft.com > wrote:[color=blue]
> I'm having trouble trying to define the difference between declaring a field
> in a class const or static. i've noted that when referencing them from the
> class that a const is symbolized with a field symbol & a static has a blue
> box. What is the difference? What is the blue box? Has it got to do with
> scope or get/setability?[/color]

The value of a const is compiled into any class which uses it, rather
than referencing the value at runtime. The potentially makes it more
efficient, but at the cost that if they're in different assemblies and
you change the value of the const, you have to recompile the other
assembly in order to see the change.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>

http://www.pobox.com/~skeet

If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Christof Nordiek]

Re: const Vs static

Hi Ant,

a const has a value, that is known at compiletime. That value can't change
while runtime and
can be part of a constant expression.
static is a member, that belongs to a class/struct not to an instance of
that class/struct.
A static field is a variable that exists once per application, whil instance
variables exist once per instance.
The value of a static variable can change during runtime.

Christof

"Ant" <Ant@discussion s.microsoft.com > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:982CE8A2-6A52-441F-954F-325E688E6A5C@mi crosoft.com...[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble trying to define the difference between declaring a
> field
> in a class const or static. i've noted that when referencing them from the
> class that a const is symbolized with a field symbol & a static has a blue
> box. What is the difference? What is the blue box? Has it got to do with
> scope or get/setability?
>
> Thanks for your thoughts in advance
>
> Ant[/color]

[Jon Skeet [C# MVP]]

Re: const Vs static

Ant <Ant@discussion s.microsoft.com > wrote:[color=blue]
> I'm having trouble trying to define the difference between declaring a field
> in a class const or static. i've noted that when referencing them from the
> class that a const is symbolized with a field symbol & a static has a blue
> box. What is the difference? What is the blue box? Has it got to do with
> scope or get/setability?[/color]

The value of a const is compiled into any class which uses it, rather
than referencing the value at runtime. The potentially makes it more
efficient, but at the cost that if they're in different assemblies and
you change the value of the const, you have to recompile the other
assembly in order to see the change.

--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.co m>

http://www.pobox.com/~skeet

If replying to the group, please do not mail me too

[Christof Nordiek]

Re: const Vs static

Hi Ant,

a const has a value, that is known at compiletime. That value can't change
while runtime and
can be part of a constant expression.
static is a member, that belongs to a class/struct not to an instance of
that class/struct.
A static field is a variable that exists once per application, whil instance
variables exist once per instance.
The value of a static variable can change during runtime.

Christof

"Ant" <Ant@discussion s.microsoft.com > schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:982CE8A2-6A52-441F-954F-325E688E6A5C@mi crosoft.com...[color=blue]
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble trying to define the difference between declaring a
> field
> in a class const or static. i've noted that when referencing them from the
> class that a const is symbolized with a field symbol & a static has a blue
> box. What is the difference? What is the blue box? Has it got to do with
> scope or get/setability?
>
> Thanks for your thoughts in advance
>
> Ant[/color]