Re: username and password validation
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:01:51 -0500, Dave Anderson
<NYRUMTPELVWH@s pammotel.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Justin Piper wrote:[color=green]
>> I can't even see how it would work. If omitting Option
>> Explicit causes the parser to skip the pass where it checks
>> for declared variables, then it wouldn't have an opportunity
>> to build the name tables Eric describes, and it would have
>> to fall back on the hunt-all-over-everywhere strategy. It
>> sounds like complete bunk to me.[/color]
>
> I don't think it's possible for the parser to not parse the script,
> Option
> Explicit or not.[/color]
Well, if I understand the claim against using Option Explicit correctly,
it's that with it enabled there are two passes, one looking for
exclusively for Dim statements and one that processes the script. It's
possible that it works that way, but it would be a very peculiar thing to
do.
--
Justin Piper
Bizco Technologies
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:01:51 -0500, Dave Anderson
<NYRUMTPELVWH@s pammotel.com> wrote:
[color=blue]
> Justin Piper wrote:[color=green]
>> I can't even see how it would work. If omitting Option
>> Explicit causes the parser to skip the pass where it checks
>> for declared variables, then it wouldn't have an opportunity
>> to build the name tables Eric describes, and it would have
>> to fall back on the hunt-all-over-everywhere strategy. It
>> sounds like complete bunk to me.[/color]
>
> I don't think it's possible for the parser to not parse the script,
> Option
> Explicit or not.[/color]
Well, if I understand the claim against using Option Explicit correctly,
it's that with it enabled there are two passes, one looking for
exclusively for Dim statements and one that processes the script. It's
possible that it works that way, but it would be a very peculiar thing to
do.
--
Justin Piper
Bizco Technologies
Comment