Nice response Jeremy.
I must admit that I'd rather discounted this problem from earlier info, but it seems that was premature. Excel, as a means of transferring data, does have a number of complications associated that make it a pretty limited choice. This is one of them. It tries to be too clever. If the first number of rows indicate that a column may be treated as numeric (or other specific data type) then it will treat that column that way and fall over any data that doesn't match it's self-determined pattern.
That all said, you seem to have extracted a win from a pretty hopeless situation so I'm really quite impressed. Posting an explanation for travellers that follow in your footsteps is a definite bonus.
I must admit that I'd rather discounted this problem from earlier info, but it seems that was premature. Excel, as a means of transferring data, does have a number of complications associated that make it a pretty limited choice. This is one of them. It tries to be too clever. If the first number of rows indicate that a column may be treated as numeric (or other specific data type) then it will treat that column that way and fall over any data that doesn't match it's self-determined pattern.
That all said, you seem to have extracted a win from a pretty hopeless situation so I'm really quite impressed. Posting an explanation for travellers that follow in your footsteps is a definite bonus.
Comment