access table field question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RuralGuy
    Recognized Expert Contributor
    • Oct 2006
    • 375

    #46
    BTW here's a pretty good breakdown for Normalization on this forum.

    Comment

    • simplerequest
      New Member
      • Mar 2009
      • 25

      #47
      reviewing

      i see the change you made on the form with the combo box

      but i dont see how this works for the table there is not facility number on the table i will need that

      Comment

      • RuralGuy
        Recognized Expert Contributor
        • Oct 2006
        • 375

        #48
        You have the FacID in the table. With that you can always get the facility number with a join. That is the beauty and the power of queries and joins. It is as if all of the related tables are just one big table.

        Comment

        • RuralGuy
          Recognized Expert Contributor
          • Oct 2006
          • 375

          #49
          Open the qryRecReport directly. Don't you see the values you need in there?

          Comment

          • simplerequest
            New Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 25

            #50
            falling asleep will read the normalization tomrrow. can we meet again tomorrow?

            Comment

            • RuralGuy
              Recognized Expert Contributor
              • Oct 2006
              • 375

              #51
              If you have no more questions for right now then I'll toddle off to bed. We can hit it again in the morning. Just post and we'll hook up.

              Comment

              • simplerequest
                New Member
                • Mar 2009
                • 25

                #52
                only opened the two tables went back and looked at the querry
                thanks the form is working

                can i get back to your tomorrow, will you be willing to assist again i can not keep my eyes open

                Comment

                • RuralGuy
                  Recognized Expert Contributor
                  • Oct 2006
                  • 375

                  #53
                  Whenever you want to start just post a question here.

                  Comment

                  • NeoPa
                    Recognized Expert Moderator MVP
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 32633

                    #54
                    Originally posted by RuralGuy
                    Here's a link you need to read: The Evils of Lookup Fields in Tables
                    That's nice to see. I thought it must be the 'right' way to do things, but it's only ever led to problems for any databases I've ever had to review.

                    Thanks for the link RG :)

                    Comment

                    • RuralGuy
                      Recognized Expert Contributor
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 375

                      #55
                      You and almost everyone that uses them. You're welcome.

                      Comment

                      • FishVal
                        Recognized Expert Specialist
                        • Jun 2007
                        • 2656

                        #56
                        Originally posted by RuralGuy
                        Here's a link you need to read: The Evils of Lookup Fields in Tables
                        Unfortunately it doesn't have a part "The Goods of Lookup Fields in Tables".
                        Obviously, it was dropped to not to spoil the impression.

                        Does anybody like to discuss it in a separate thread?

                        Comment

                        • RuralGuy
                          Recognized Expert Contributor
                          • Oct 2006
                          • 375

                          #57
                          Start a new thread ans see who joins.

                          Comment

                          • FishVal
                            Recognized Expert Specialist
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 2656

                            #58
                            Actually, I don't even see what to discuss there.
                            All points of that article are weak, inconsistent and arguable. At the same time I have no idea what to add against "lookup fields". This makes me feel it will be a discussion of trivial things.

                            Comment

                            • NeoPa
                              Recognized Expert Moderator MVP
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 32633

                              #59
                              Originally posted by FishVal
                              Does anybody like to discuss it in a separate thread?
                              Originally posted by FishVal
                              Actually, I don't even see what to discuss there.
                              Now I'm really confused :S

                              Comment

                              • RuralGuy
                                Recognized Expert Contributor
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 375

                                #60
                                I don't think you are alone NeoPa.

                                Comment

                                Working...