I am in the United States.
I adjusted the code as indicated above to see if that would make a difference, but there was not change in the outcome.
I have converted the database to the 2003 version as you requested.
It seems that this is a SQL Server issue as the information displays properly when the table is in access instead of linked through an ODBC connection to the SQL Server.
For example:
The database connected to the SQL Server does not properly display the data for 11/2/2010. The data is displayed properly in the list box, but it is not shown in the calendar grid.
In the attached database, the data for 11/2/2010 is displayed properly in the list box and the calendar grid.
I adjusted the code as indicated above to see if that would make a difference, but there was not change in the outcome.
I have converted the database to the 2003 version as you requested.
It seems that this is a SQL Server issue as the information displays properly when the table is in access instead of linked through an ODBC connection to the SQL Server.
For example:
The database connected to the SQL Server does not properly display the data for 11/2/2010. The data is displayed properly in the list box, but it is not shown in the calendar grid.
In the attached database, the data for 11/2/2010 is displayed properly in the list box and the calendar grid.


Comment