family database

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tony Toews [MVP]

    #16
    Re: family database

    "Steve" <Sorry@private. emailaddresswro te:
    >I took Tony's response to say a Family table with Parent1 and Parent2 fields
    >and Child1, Child2, Child3, etc fields. In the OP's scenario, it is
    >reasonable to assume he means young children who can njot also be parents.
    No, I meant a family table with basically an address and phone number on it.
    Possibly a last name. No, more likely the "head of the household", however the
    family defines it. Then a family member table with each adult and child in that
    table.

    I may not have phrased it or explained it very well though in hindsight.

    Tony
    --
    Tony Toews, Microsoft Access MVP
    Please respond only in the newsgroups so that others can
    read the entire thread of messages.
    Microsoft Access Links, Hints, Tips & Accounting Systems at

    Tony's Microsoft Access Blog - http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/

    Comment

    • John Marshall, MVP

      #17
      Re: family database

      Welcome to the world of steve.

      John... Visio MVP

      "Arch" <send.no@spam.n etwrote in message
      news:42h9a3p4ng jfvgcgihim9ghc6 bst92ksnc@4ax.c om...
      >
      Geez resource. How on earth did you make this assumption:
      >
      >>I took Tony's response to say a Family table with Parent1 and Parent2
      >>fields
      >>and Child1, Child2, Child3, etc fields. In the OP's scenario, it is
      >>reasonable to assume he means young children who can njot also be parents.
      >
      From this:
      >
      >>>>I'd create a family table and assign the parent(s) and children to the
      >>>>family.
      >
      You are defending the poor solution that you recommended with
      arguments that are totally illogical. The solution that Tony (and
      others) recommend doesn't build in the clumsy limitations that yours
      does.

      Comment

      • Larry Linson

        #18
        Re: family database

        "Tony Toews [MVP]" <ttoews@teluspl anet.netwrote
        I may not have phrased it or explained
        it very well though in hindsight.
        You can't phrase or explain something well enough that someone looking for
        an argument won't somehow try to argue about it, even if that means
        completely redefining what you said. I'd have thought that, by now, Steve
        would have learned his lesson and would know better than to try to start a
        fight in this newsgroup.

        Larry Linson
        who's been in CDMA since casting a vote approving
        its creation, and seen it survive far worse than Steve




        Comment

        • John Marshall, MVP

          #19
          Re: family database

          You seem to be crediting steve with some form of intelligence. He is just a
          script kidding who subscribes to the Monty Python school of arguments and
          abhors spoiling an argument with simple things like truth or facts.

          John... Visio MVP

          "Larry Linson" <bouncer@localh ost.notwrote in message
          news:1Nbpi.2827 $Da.361@trnddc0 7...
          I'd have thought that, by now, Steve would have learned his lesson and
          would know better than to try to start a fight in this newsgroup.
          >
          Larry Linson
          who's been in CDMA since casting a vote approving
          its creation, and seen it survive far worse than Steve

          Comment

          Working...