Replication gone crazy

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John

    #1

    Replication gone crazy

    Hi

    When I try to resolve replication conflicts, first of all 'Microsoft
    Replication Conflict Viewer' gets stuck for 15-20 seconds then it gives the
    error 'There was an error trying to obtain data for a specific conflict
    table for 'MyTable'. The viewer can not display this conflict.". In the log
    file I get the following two types of entries;

    Database Publication Table Origin_DataSour ce RowGuidValue conflict_type
    reason_text

    F:\MyDB.mdb (Not Specified) MyTable C:\MyDB.mdb
    {1BCC3F03-5972-4F9B-A88E-903B08F86FC0} 3736 Update/delete conflict. This
    updated record was deleted at another replica. Either reinsert this conflict
    record or delete it.

    F:\MyDB.mdb (Not Specified) MyTable {1BCC3F03-5972-4F9B-A88E-903B08F86FC0}
    3736 Update/delete conflict. This updated record was deleted at another
    replica. Either reinsert this conflict record or delete it.

    Any idea what is wrong and how can I fix it?

    Thanks

    Regards



  • David W. Fenton

    #2
    Re: Replication gone crazy

    "John" <John@nospam.in fovis.co.ukwrot e in
    news:LaOdnXB1i6 a9NaXYnZ2dneKdn ZydnZ2d@pipex.n et:
    When I try to resolve replication conflicts, first of all
    'Microsoft Replication Conflict Viewer' gets stuck for 15-20
    seconds then it gives the error 'There was an error trying to
    obtain data for a specific conflict table for 'MyTable'. The
    viewer can not display this conflict.". In the log file I get the
    following two types of entries;
    >
    Database Publication Table Origin_DataSour ce RowGuidValue
    conflict_type reason_text
    >
    F:\MyDB.mdb (Not Specified) MyTable C:\MyDB.mdb
    {1BCC3F03-5972-4F9B-A88E-903B08F86FC0} 3736 Update/delete
    conflict. This updated record was deleted at another replica.
    Either reinsert this conflict record or delete it.
    >
    F:\MyDB.mdb (Not Specified) MyTable
    {1BCC3F03-5972-4F9B-A88E-903B08F86FC0} 3736 Update/delete
    conflict. This updated record was deleted at another replica.
    Either reinsert this conflict record or delete it.
    >
    Any idea what is wrong and how can I fix it?
    Between synchs, a record was updated in one replica and deleted in
    another.

    This oughtn't be a problem, but something has gone wrong.

    Check the records involved in the replicas identified and see what
    you can see. Should the record have been deleted? If so, you can
    discard the updated version and leave it alone. You can confirm this
    by checking the conflict table for the table in question (it will be
    called MyTable_Conflic ts, and will be marked HIDDEN, so you'll need
    to go to TOOLS | OPTIONS and turn on display of hidden objects;
    while there, you might as well display system objects, because you
    may need to use the replication system tables, as well). Using the
    RowGUIDValue, you can check to see if the record was in fact deleted
    from MyTable. If it was, there won't be any row with s_GUID set to
    that value. If there *is* a row with that value, it means the record
    was *not* deleted.

    The log file most likely has two entries because you have synched
    twice (either with the same replica or with two different replicas)
    -- both entries refer to the same record (the GUID is the same) and
    the same error type.

    Now, if the record should *not* have been deleted, then you'll need
    to add it back by appending the version of the record in conflict
    table to the main table, but ignoring all the replication fields.
    That will create a new record with the same data but it will be a
    new record from Jet replication's point of view.

    Once you've resolved this issue, you can delete the conflict record
    from the conflict table (or the whole conflict table if there are no
    other conflicts).

    --
    David W. Fenton http://www.dfenton.com/
    usenet at dfenton dot com http://www.dfenton.com/DFA/

    Comment

    Working...