I have been told over and over again that a SQL Server back-end is much faster than an Access back-end, and I have absolutely no doubt that it is. I've read many articles and commentary that confirm this. The side-by-side stats of Access and SQL Server are overwhelmingly in favor of SQL Server.
My question is: Why? What did the developers of SQL Server do differently than the developers of Access?
I understand this is a fairly open-ended question but I've struggled to find distinct reasons why it is such a superior method of data management other than "because it's just so much better, look at the stats!"
My question is: Why? What did the developers of SQL Server do differently than the developers of Access?
I understand this is a fairly open-ended question but I've struggled to find distinct reasons why it is such a superior method of data management other than "because it's just so much better, look at the stats!"
Comment