New server setup and RAID recommendation

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • serge

    New server setup and RAID recommendation

    I have a database that is around 2 to 4 GB.
    If I were to estimate some numbers like 4x growth or
    even 10x, the database size could reach 40GB.
    The new server will be running SQL Server 2005.

    I am not sure which configuration option to take.
    I've gathered some information from different places:

    Configuration #1:
    OS - Raid1 2x36GB
    Logs - Raid1 2x36GB
    Data - Raid 5 4x73GB


    Configuration #2:
    OS - Raid1 2x36GB
    Logs - Raid5 (not sure how many drives)
    Data - Raid5 (not sure how many drives)


    Now if I am using a separate RAID array disks
    for the database's transaction log, should I also put the
    TempDB in this RAID also?

    Here's the configuration I am thinking of right now.
    Please give me your comments:

    OS - Raid1 2x36GB
    Logs & TempDB - Raid5 3x36GB = 2x36GB usable space
    Data - Raid5 3x73GB = 2x73GB usable space

    If you have other configurations you recommend please let
    me know.


    Thank you


  • LLik

    #2
    Re: New server setup and RAID recommendation

    For the install and forget about I want protection and speed at a low
    cost use RAID 5 for everything.

    Now if you want the best performance and protect for the type of work
    being done use the follow.

    For the system files and executables, reading binaries doesn't really
    put much overhead on the servers, so it is not a major concern. Any
    RAID level could be used.

    For data files, RAID 1 is preferable because it gives the best tradeoff
    between performance, protection and cost. Because it is 100 percent
    redundant, it both protects the data and the availability of your
    system. Availability is the reason that you for using RAID with a
    database, and even the loss of a small internal database can bring down
    the database server. In this case, you will not lose any data but the
    users will have to live without your system. If performance and
    security are your major factors then RAID 10 should be used. No matter
    what RAID level is used each RAID array should have as many physical
    disks in the array as the controller will support. This allows reads
    and writes to be performed simultaneously on each physical drive in the
    array, significantly boosting disk I/O.

    Log files, by their nature, are mostly written to, which means that
    often RAID 1 is your best choice for performance. As with the
    database files if performance and security are your major issues RAID
    10 should be used.

    Comment

    Working...