On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 12:15:50 -0700 (PDT), mark <mark.fink1@goo glemail.comwrot e:
No, you have to have a slave. It can run on the same machine, it can
run as the same user, but it has to exist. The buildmaster can only
tell slaves to do work (of course, this is all written in Python, so
it is a simple matter of programming to *make* the buildmaster capable
of doing the slave's job, but there's not really any reason to try to
do this).
Jean-Paul
>I want to start small and setup a buildbot on one machine (no slaves).
>I hope this is possible. I assume I only need one master in this case
>(without slave config)???
>
>from my master.cfg
>c['slaves'] = []
>
>... (rest of the sample config)
>
>b1 = {'name': "buildbot-full",
># 'slavename': "bot1name",
'builddir': "full",
'factory': f1,
}
>
>Do I need some configuration that the builder uses the master
>instance? I experimented a bit and searched for a similar
>configuratio n so far without success :-((
>
>I hope this is possible. I assume I only need one master in this case
>(without slave config)???
>
>from my master.cfg
>c['slaves'] = []
>
>... (rest of the sample config)
>
>b1 = {'name': "buildbot-full",
># 'slavename': "bot1name",
'builddir': "full",
'factory': f1,
}
>
>Do I need some configuration that the builder uses the master
>instance? I experimented a bit and searched for a similar
>configuratio n so far without success :-((
>
run as the same user, but it has to exist. The buildmaster can only
tell slaves to do work (of course, this is all written in Python, so
it is a simple matter of programming to *make* the buildmaster capable
of doing the slave's job, but there's not really any reason to try to
do this).
Jean-Paul