2008/9/3 Hendrik van Rooyen <mail@microcorp .co.za>:
One big downside with that approach is that it becomes much harder to
grep for the log message. Usually when I go through logs, I don't care
what exactly the message says, just that it is easily googleable (uses
some kind of identifying text) and that it is unique so I can know
exactly where it was emitted.
--
mvh Björn
>
Steven D'Aprano <stev...bersour ce.com.auwrote:
>
>
Not sure if its "better", but I would keep the messages in a table or dict and
have different tables or dicts for different levels of verbosity, and write a
displayer that knows about the verbosity - This approach has the advantage that
you can write in English and have different verbosities in different languages
too, if the displayer knows about the language.
Steven D'Aprano <stev...bersour ce.com.auwrote:
>
>>Is there a better way of doing this than the way I am going about it?
Not sure if its "better", but I would keep the messages in a table or dict and
have different tables or dicts for different levels of verbosity, and write a
displayer that knows about the verbosity - This approach has the advantage that
you can write in English and have different verbosities in different languages
too, if the displayer knows about the language.
grep for the log message. Usually when I go through logs, I don't care
what exactly the message says, just that it is easily googleable (uses
some kind of identifying text) and that it is unique so I can know
exactly where it was emitted.
--
mvh Björn