Weird Python startup behavior between different drives on PowerPCplatform

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jwahlmann@gmail.com

    Weird Python startup behavior between different drives on PowerPCplatform

    I'm experiencing some strange behavior when starting up python on a
    Debian-based PowerPC platform. Normally, I operate from this platform
    with a root file system on an IDE flash drive (/dev/hda1). However,
    I'm trying to get my system to run with root on a mechanical SATA
    drive (/dev/sda1). Both are installed on a PowerPC board via a PMC
    daughter board.

    When running off the flash drive, the Python interpreter loads and
    runs just fine. However, when running from SATA, the interpreter
    seems to have problems with importing things like site, os, etc. I've
    played around with PYTHONHOME to no effect. I even went as far as
    setting PYTHONHOME to some off the wall location (so no stdlibs will
    load) and invoking Python as:

    host$ PYTHONHOME=/tmp python -d -v -S
    # installing zipimport hook
    import zipimport # builtin
    # installed zipimport hook
    Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 5 2007, 19:01:44)
    [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
    >>i=0
    File "<stdin>", line 1
    i=0
    ^
    SyntaxError: invalid syntax
    >>>
    You'll note that doing something as simple as setting "i=0" results in
    a syntax error. If I run the same thing on the IDE flash drive, it
    works:

    host$ PYTHONHOME=/tmp python -d -v -S
    # installing zipimport hook
    import zipimport # builtin
    # installed zipimport hook
    Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 5 2007, 19:01:44)
    [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
    >>i=0
    >>>
    Any ideas?! What could possibly cause a difference of operation
    between running from a IDE flash drive (/dev/hda1) vs. SATA (/dev/
    sda1)? Other than toggling hda1 vs. sda1 in /etc/fstab, the
    filesystems are being built identically. Could it be that shared
    libraries aren't being loaded correctly or fast enough off the SATA
    drive vs. flash? Shooting in the dark here...

    Thanks,
    Jon Wahlmann
  • jwahlmann@gmail.com

    #2
    Re: Weird Python startup behavior between different drives on PowerPCplatform

    Bump. Anyone have any ideas on this? My next step is to either link
    together a static version of the compiler or create a debug version.

    Thanks,
    Jon

    On Jul 18, 11:43 am, jwahlm...@gmail .com wrote:
    I'm experiencing some strange behavior when starting up python on a
    Debian-based PowerPC platform. Normally, I operate from this platform
    with a root file system on an IDE flash drive (/dev/hda1). However,
    I'm trying to get my system to run with root on a mechanical SATA
    drive (/dev/sda1). Both are installed on a PowerPC board via a PMC
    daughter board.
    >
    When running off the flash drive, the Python interpreter loads and
    runs just fine. However, when running from SATA, the interpreter
    seems to have problems with importing things like site, os, etc. I've
    played around with PYTHONHOME to no effect. I even went as far as
    setting PYTHONHOME to some off the wall location (so no stdlibs will
    load) and invoking Python as:
    >
    host$ PYTHONHOME=/tmp python -d -v -S
    # installing zipimport hook
    import zipimport # builtin
    # installed zipimport hook
    Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 5 2007, 19:01:44)
    [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2>>i=0
    >
    File "<stdin>", line 1
    i=0
    ^
    SyntaxError: invalid syntax
    >
    >
    >
    You'll note that doing something as simple as setting "i=0" results in
    a syntax error. If I run the same thing on the IDE flash drive, it
    works:
    >
    host$ PYTHONHOME=/tmp python -d -v -S
    # installing zipimport hook
    import zipimport # builtin
    # installed zipimport hook
    Python 2.4.4 (#2, Apr 5 2007, 19:01:44)
    [GCC 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)] on linux2
    >
    >i=0
    >
    Any ideas?! What could possibly cause a difference of operation
    between running from a IDE flash drive (/dev/hda1) vs. SATA (/dev/
    sda1)? Other than toggling hda1 vs. sda1 in /etc/fstab, the
    filesystems are being built identically. Could it be that shared
    libraries aren't being loaded correctly or fast enough off the SATA
    drive vs. flash? Shooting in the dark here...
    >
    Thanks,
    Jon Wahlmann

    Comment

    Working...