RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Barry Warsaw

    RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm
    happy to announce the second alpha release of Python 2.6, and the
    fourth alpha release of Python 3.0.

    Please note that these are alpha releases, and as such are not
    suitable for production environments. We continue to strive for a
    high degree of quality, but there are still some known problems and
    the feature sets have not been finalized. These alphas are being
    released to solicit feedback and hopefully discover bugs, as well as
    allowing you to determine how changes in 2.6 and 3.0 might impact
    you. If you find things broken or incorrect, please submit a bug
    report at



    For more information and downloadable distributions, see the Python
    2.6 web
    site:

    The official home of the Python Programming Language


    and the Python 3.0 web site:

    The official home of the Python Programming Language


    We are planning one more alpha release of each version, followed by
    two beta releases, with the final releases planned for August 2008.
    See PEP 361 for release details:

    This document describes the development and release schedule for Python 2.6 and 3.0. The schedule primarily concerns itself with PEP-sized items. Small features may be added up to and including the first beta release. Bugs may be fixed until the fina...


    Enjoy,
    - -Barry

    Barry Warsaw
    barry@python.or g
    Python 2.6/3.0 Release Manager
    (on behalf of the entire python-dev team)

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

    iQCVAwUBR/WImHEjvBPtnXfVA QJmoQP+MzqNDI+X t8zua/FE7Ca4TVXoIIy2u oOm
    I1i3+vmevZ9vtAb 9hcGwfEgPY4LSwb 9Js4KnJJWMPaMuF JK4NgGoiMdj+t42 zDbQ
    bEzfBUOCoVkejLR xIQnWeJf1Hu8Joc YyCHIRffv57/QdKpHuiSs8aE8GI T3STo3o
    I88H5NY1GgI=
    =WT2z
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  • Giampaolo Rodola'

    #2
    Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

    On 4 Apr, 03:47, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.o rgwrote:
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1
    >
    On behalf of the Python development team and the Python community, I'm  
    happy to announce the second alpha release of Python 2.6, and the  
    fourth alpha release of Python 3.0.
    >
    Please note that these are alpha releases, and as such are not  
    suitable for production environments.  We continue to strive for a  
    high degree of quality, but there are still some known problems and  
    the feature sets have not been finalized.  These alphas are being  
    released to solicit feedback and hopefully discover bugs, as well as  
    allowing you to determine how changes in 2.6 and 3.0 might impact  
    you.  If you find things broken or incorrect, please submit a bug  
    report at
    >
       http://bugs.python.org
    >
    For more information and downloadable distributions, see the Python  
    2.6 web
    site:
    >
       http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.6/
    >
    and the Python 3.0 web site:
    >
       http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.0/
    >
    We are planning one more alpha release of each version, followed by  
    two beta releases, with the final releases planned for August 2008.  
    See PEP 361 for release details:
    >
         http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0361/
    >
    Enjoy,
    - -Barry
    >
    Barry Warsaw
    ba...@python.or g
    Python 2.6/3.0 Release Manager
    (on behalf of the entire python-dev team)
    >
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
    >
    iQCVAwUBR/WImHEjvBPtnXfVA QJmoQP+MzqNDI+X t8zua/FE7Ca4TVXoIIy2u oOm
    I1i3+vmevZ9vtAb 9hcGwfEgPY4LSwb 9Js4KnJJWMPaMuF JK4NgGoiMdj+t42 zDbQ
    bEzfBUOCoVkejLR xIQnWeJf1Hu8Joc YyCHIRffv57/QdKpHuiSs8aE8GI T3STo3o
    I88H5NY1GgI=
    =WT2z
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.


    --- Giampaolo

    Comment

    • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=

      #3
      Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

      The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.

      And likely will continue to do so for some time.

      Regards,
      Martin

      Comment

      • Kay Schluehr

        #4
        Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

        On 4 Apr., 21:45, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
        The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
        >
        And likely will continue to do so for some time.
        >
        Regards,
        Martin
        Fine. Is there also a reason?

        Comment

        • Terry Reedy

          #5
          Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4


          "Kay Schluehr" <kay.schluehr@g mx.netwrote in message
          news:f4ac789e-c98f-4cf2-9236-f1ac609c44de@b1 g2000hsg.google groups.com...
          On 4 Apr., 21:45, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
          The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
          >
          And likely will continue to do so for some time.
          Fine. Is there also a reason?
          =============== ===========

          On PyDev, Martin gave just (but only) a bit more detail, to the effect that
          he has run into problems with the new Microsoft compiler being used for
          2.6/3.0 that apparently did not crop up with the previous alpha releases a
          month ago. I think we should be patient and not bug him for more.

          Terry



          Comment

          • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=

            #6
            Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

            Kay Schluehr wrote:
            On 4 Apr., 21:45, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
            >>The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
            >And likely will continue to do so for some time.
            >>
            >Regards,
            >Martin
            >
            Fine. Is there also a reason?
            Sure! I don't have the time to spell it out, though, please
            look at the python-dev archives. If you want to help, please
            contact me in private.

            Regards,
            Martin

            Comment

            • John Machin

              #7
              Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

              On Apr 5, 5:45 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
              The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
              >
              And likely will continue to do so for some time.
              >
              >
              Someone's got strange definitions of "missing"!

              For each there's a link on the the ptyhon.org website, and a caveat
              about non-Administrator installation ...

              If it's missing, then what do I expect to find in the 11.7Mb 2.6a2 msi
              that is downloading as I type?

              Comment

              • =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=

                #8
                Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

                John Machin wrote:
                On Apr 5, 5:45 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
                >>The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
                >And likely will continue to do so for some time.
                >>
                >>
                >
                Someone's got strange definitions of "missing"!
                Rather a flexible definition of "some time"; this turned out to be
                roughly 40 hours.

                Regards,
                Martin

                Comment

                • Giampaolo Rodola'

                  #9
                  Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

                  On 6 Apr, 00:55, John Machin <sjmac...@lexic on.netwrote:
                  On Apr 5, 5:45 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
                  >
                  The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
                  >
                  And likely will continue to do so for some time.
                  >
                  Someone's got strange definitions of "missing"!
                  >
                  For each there's a link on the the ptyhon.org website, and a caveat
                  about non-Administrator installation ...
                  >
                  If it's missing, then what do I expect to find in the 11.7Mb 2.6a2 msi
                  that is downloading as I type?
                  At the time I replied they were both missing (in fact that's why I
                  replied :-)).


                  --- Giampaolo

                  Comment

                  • John Machin

                    #10
                    Re: RELEASED Python 2.6a2 and 3.0a4

                    On Apr 7, 12:50 am, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <gne...@gmail.c omwrote:
                    On 6 Apr, 00:55, John Machin <sjmac...@lexic on.netwrote:
                    >
                    On Apr 5, 5:45 am, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewi s.dewrote:
                    >
                    The Windows x86 MSI installer is missing for both 2.6 and 3.0.
                    >
                    And likely will continue to do so for some time.
                    >
                    Someone's got strange definitions of "missing"!
                    >
                    For each there's a link on the the ptyhon.org website, and a caveat
                    about non-Administrator installation ...
                    >
                    If it's missing, then what do I expect to find in the 11.7Mb 2.6a2 msi
                    that is downloading as I type?
                    >
                    At the time I replied they were both missing (in fact that's why I
                    replied :-)).
                    >
                    And at the time I replied, at least one was available but the most
                    recent information in this newsgroup was that they were unavailable
                    and would be so for some fuzzily-denominated duration which seemed
                    seriously long ... perhaps my two different and not totally reliable
                    news-reading facilities skipped a posting :-)

                    Comment

                    Working...