OT: Is it google groups or...

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bill H

    OT: Is it google groups or...

    I read many groups onb google groups and as of yesterday
    comp.lang.perl. misc is no longer available? Anyone know - is it google
    or is the group gone?

    Bill H

    PS forgive the OT, but if I asked this in the classic computer groups
    they would probably have no clue
  • Stevo

    #2
    Re: OT: Is it google groups or...

    Bill H wrote:
    I read many groups onb google groups and as of yesterday
    comp.lang.perl. misc is no longer available? Anyone know - is it google
    or is the group gone?
    >
    Bill H
    >
    PS forgive the OT, but if I asked this in the classic computer groups
    they would probably have no clue
    I don't know the answer to your question, but I suggest you've picked a
    wrong forum. Questions here are only valid (according to the php police
    here) if the answer can be written in php code. They won't tolerate OT
    posts here.

    Comment

    • Jeff

      #3
      Re: OT: Is it google groups or...

      Bill H wrote:
      I read many groups onb google groups and as of yesterday
      comp.lang.perl. misc is no longer available? Anyone know - is it google
      or is the group gone?
      It's on my newsfeed.

      I can think of very few groups I'd rather not post to from Google.

      Jeff
      >
      Bill H
      >
      PS forgive the OT, but if I asked this in the classic computer groups
      they would probably have no clue

      Comment

      • Dale

        #4
        Re: OT: Is it google groups or...


        "Stevo" <no@mail.invali dwrote in message
        news:g7t088$8qc $01$1@news.t-online.com...
        Bill H wrote:
        >I read many groups onb google groups and as of yesterday
        >comp.lang.perl .misc is no longer available? Anyone know - is it google
        >or is the group gone?
        >>
        >Bill H
        >>
        >PS forgive the OT, but if I asked this in the classic computer groups
        >they would probably have no clue
        >
        I don't know the answer to your question, but I suggest you've picked a
        wrong forum. Questions here are only valid (according to the php police
        here) if the answer can be written in php code. They won't tolerate OT
        posts here.
        "THEY" being jerry stuck-hole. :)


        Comment

        • Krustov

          #5
          Re: OT: Is it google groups or...

          <comp.lang.ph p>
          <Dale>
          <Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:56:50 -0500>
          <JPtok.13619$3l 5.12237@newsfe0 6.iad>
          I don't know the answer to your question, but I suggest you've picked a
          wrong forum. Questions here are only valid (according to the php police
          here) if the answer can be written in php code. They won't tolerate OT
          posts here.
          >
          "THEY" being jerry stuck-hole. :)
          >
          Isnt that a insult to arse-holes ? .


          --

          Comment

          • Twayne

            #6
            OT Re: OT: Is it google groups or...

            "Stevo" <no@mail.invali dwrote in message
            news:g7t088$8qc $01$1@news.t-online.com...
            >Bill H wrote:
            >>I read many groups onb google groups and as of yesterday
            >>comp.lang.per l.misc is no longer available? Anyone know - is it
            >>google or is the group gone?
            >>>
            >>Bill H
            >>>
            >>PS forgive the OT, but if I asked this in the classic computer
            >>groups they would probably have no clue
            >>
            >I don't know the answer to your question, but I suggest you've
            >picked a wrong forum. Questions here are only valid (according to
            >the php police here) if the answer can be written in php code. They
            >won't tolerate OT posts here.
            >
            "THEY" being jerry stuck-hole. :)
            I'm afraid you'll have to add me to that list; they're nothing but
            pollution most of the time.


            Comment

            • Twayne

              #7
              OT Re: OT: Is it google groups or...

              <comp.lang.ph p>
              <Dale>
              <Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:56:50 -0500>
              <JPtok.13619$3l 5.12237@newsfe0 6.iad>
              >
              >>I don't know the answer to your question, but I suggest you've
              >>picked a wrong forum. Questions here are only valid (according to
              >>the php police here) if the answer can be written in php code. They
              >>won't tolerate OT posts here.
              >>
              >"THEY" being jerry stuck-hole. :)
              >>
              >
              Isnt that a insult to arse-holes ? .
              Nope, not an insult to you, no worry.:^)


              Comment

              • Dale

                #8
                Re: OT Re: OT: Is it google groups or...


                "Twayne" <nobody@devnull .spamcop.netwro te in message
                news:LyGok.997$ T91.789@trnddc0 4...
                >"Stevo" <no@mail.invali dwrote in message
                >news:g7t088$8q c$01$1@news.t-online.com...
                >>Bill H wrote:
                >>>I read many groups onb google groups and as of yesterday
                >>>comp.lang.pe rl.misc is no longer available? Anyone know - is it
                >>>google or is the group gone?
                >>>>
                >>>Bill H
                >>>>
                >>>PS forgive the OT, but if I asked this in the classic computer
                >>>groups they would probably have no clue
                >>>
                >>I don't know the answer to your question, but I suggest you've
                >>picked a wrong forum. Questions here are only valid (according to
                >>the php police here) if the answer can be written in php code. They
                >>won't tolerate OT posts here.
                >>
                >"THEY" being jerry stuck-hole. :)
                >
                I'm afraid you'll have to add me to that list; they're nothing but
                pollution most of the time.
                isn't that necessarily saying it's relative by saying 'most of the time'?
                'pollution', then, is based on whether or not you find the OT post valuable
                in some way. in that case, allow ANY OT post and *ignore* the ones you don't
                find valuable. someone *else* may find your 'pollution' valuable.

                that, or be consistent and fair by saying "they're nothing but
                pollution...per iod".

                :)


                Comment

                Working...