Reflection API doesn't provide list of Nested Functions

[rehevkor5]

I am trying to use the reflection API in PHP 5 to execute the functions
in a class which looks like:

class Meow
{
function context()
{
function a()
{
}

function b()
{
}
}
}


I can run the following code to get the methods inside the Meow class,
but have no way of getting the functions inside those methods. In this
case, I specifically cannot get to a() and b() even though I know about
context().

$class = new ReflectionClass ('Meow');

$methods = $class->getMethods() ;

foreach($method s as $method)
{
//get functions inside $method (how??)
}

Is there a way to do this? If not, I'm thinking of submitting a bug
report to PHP.net

[Moot]

Re: Reflection API doesn't provide list of Nested Functions

rehevkor5 wrote:

I am trying to use the reflection API in PHP 5 to execute the functions
in a class which looks like:
>
class Meow
{
function context()
{
function a()
{
}
>
function b()
{
}
}
}
>
>
I can run the following code to get the methods inside the Meow class,
but have no way of getting the functions inside those methods. In this
case, I specifically cannot get to a() and b() even though I know about
context().
>
$class = new ReflectionClass ('Meow');
>
$methods = $class->getMethods() ;
>
foreach($method s as $method)
{
//get functions inside $method (how??)
}
>
Is there a way to do this? If not, I'm thinking of submitting a bug
report to PHP.net

Look at this page from the manual, specifically example 17-3.

http://us3.php.net/manual/en/language.functions.php

It seems as if the inner "bar" function does not exist until the
function "foo" is called once. I'm not completely sure, but it would
seem to me to be that functions a and b are not in the reflection API
yet because as far as PHP knows, they don't exist.

I'm curious, though, as to why you have structured the class this way.
With only the code you provided to go on, I'd guess you're trying to
change the logic for the a and b functions depending on which context
function you call. A much cleaner way to do that would be to use the
Factory pattern and subclass out each context you want to have
available.

[rehevkor5]

Re: Reflection API doesn't provide list of Nested Functions

Moot wrote:

rehevkor5 wrote:

I am trying to use the reflection API in PHP 5 to execute the functions
in a class which looks like:

class Meow
{
function context()
{
function a()
{
}

function b()
{
}
}
}


I can run the following code to get the methods inside the Meow class,
but have no way of getting the functions inside those methods. In this
case, I specifically cannot get to a() and b() even though I know about
context().

$class = new ReflectionClass ('Meow');

$methods = $class->getMethods() ;

foreach($method s as $method)
{
//get functions inside $method (how??)
}

Is there a way to do this? If not, I'm thinking of submitting a bug
report to PHP.net

>
Look at this page from the manual, specifically example 17-3.

http://us3.php.net/manual/en/language.functions.php

>
It seems as if the inner "bar" function does not exist until the
function "foo" is called once. I'm not completely sure, but it would
seem to me to be that functions a and b are not in the reflection API
yet because as far as PHP knows, they don't exist.
>
I'm curious, though, as to why you have structured the class this way.
With only the code you provided to go on, I'd guess you're trying to
change the logic for the a and b functions depending on which context
function you call. A much cleaner way to do that would be to use the
Factory pattern and subclass out each context you want to have
available.

I bet you're right, good call. Now it's a question of how conscious a
design decision that was. If I submit a bug report based on it, they
may mark it "bogus" and say it behaves as expected.

As for my code & why it's structured that way, it's just something I'm
fiddling with to imitate the RSpec syntax. Since that's written in
Ruby, it has some language constructs that don't really exist in PHP.
I'm coming to the conclusion that it won't be possible to directly
imitate RSpec. This is all just preliminary though. I thought I'd
give it a whack. If my code did what you said, subclassing would
indeed be much better.