Any hints for converting from ZIP to ZIP+4 for a street address?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Al Dykes

    Any hints for converting from ZIP to ZIP+4 for a street address?


    Does anyone have an idea on how to find ZIP+4 codes?

    Thanks

    --
    a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m

    Don't blame me. I voted for Gore.
  • Gordon Burditt

    #2
    Re: Any hints for converting from ZIP to ZIP+4 for a street address?

    >Does anyone have an idea on how to find ZIP+4 codes?

    The TIGER data from the Census bureau contains a *LOT* of data.
    (If only there was a good way of getting useful information out of
    it.) For each *block*, you get info like street name, range of
    street numbers, Zip+4 on each side, lat/long coordinates of each
    endpoint of the block, and possibly some points in the middle if
    it's not straight. It does not, however, try to give street number
    ranges that are actually used (e.g. my block is 1200-1298, which
    doesn't say that the house at the end of the block is 1232 and
    there's no room for 1234-1298). The schema involves lots of big
    numbers that are only unique on a per-county basis.

    Assuming, for example, that you can match the street address to
    a specific block (given that there may be multiple Elm Streets
    in nearby towns, and possibly even in the same town, and you may have
    to deal with Elm Street, Elm Road, Elm Boulevard, Elm Freeway,
    Elm Lake, Elm River, and Elm Memorial Garbage Dump), you could
    get the Zip+4. Some of this might be narrowed down with the
    5-digit Zip if that was known.

    Warning: as I recall, this data takes up more than one DVD and
    it's heavily compressed. Putting it in database tables would expand
    it a lot.

    Oh, yes, I'm also not sure about how accurate the data is or how
    up-to-date it is. Also, the data only attempts to include Zip+4
    that represent *street* addresses. Zip+4 allocated to banks of
    P.O. boxes in a post office aren't included.

    Gordon L. Burditt

    Comment

    Working...