I've looked high and low for this answer and have finally landed here
to ask the question:
I want to distribure perlglob.exe with a compiled perl application
(created with the PAR package on Windows). Is including a copy of the
GPL sufficient to cover licensing issues? Or should I include
win32/perlglob.c in my distribution along with the Artistic license?
From `perl -v`
Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License
or the
GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source
kit.
perlglob.exe has no license information in either the source .c file
or the resulting executable.
Thanks-
-dennis.
to ask the question:
I want to distribure perlglob.exe with a compiled perl application
(created with the PAR package on Windows). Is including a copy of the
GPL sufficient to cover licensing issues? Or should I include
win32/perlglob.c in my distribution along with the Artistic license?
From `perl -v`
Perl may be copied only under the terms of either the Artistic License
or the
GNU General Public License, which may be found in the Perl 5 source
kit.
perlglob.exe has no license information in either the source .c file
or the resulting executable.
Thanks-
-dennis.