table API

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bdj

    table API

    Hello!
    With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.

    When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have to
    modify an single row by an
    Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) -
    right?

    Where to read more about it?

    Greetings
    Bjørn


  • Mark C. Stock

    #2
    Re: table API


    "bdj" <B.D.Jensen@gmx .netwrote in message
    news:41bf3ce8$0 $281$edfadb0f@d read11.news.tel e.dk...
    | Hello!
    | With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.
    |
    | When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when have
    to
    | modify an single row by an
    | Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example web-interfaces) -
    | right?
    |
    | Where to read more about it?
    |
    | Greetings
    | Bjørn
    |
    |

    i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've had
    to maintain

    TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you fold
    in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains a
    table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging. on
    many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance i've
    had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures are
    accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a
    nice clean structure to work with.

    ++ mcs


    Comment

    • bdj

      #3
      Re: table API

      Hi!
      But what about performance when you have to manipulate more than one row
      quickly?
      Greetings
      Bjørn
      "Mark C. Stock" <mcstockX@Xenqu ery .comskrev i en meddelelse
      news:apOdnWPwar UfvV3cRVn-rg@comcast.com. ..
      >
      "bdj" <B.D.Jensen@gmx .netwrote in message
      news:41bf3ce8$0 $281$edfadb0f@d read11.news.tel e.dk...
      | Hello!
      | With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.
      |
      | When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when
      have
      to
      | modify an single row by an
      | Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example
      web-interfaces) -
      | right?
      |
      | Where to read more about it?
      |
      | Greetings
      | Bjørn
      |
      |
      >
      i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've had
      to maintain
      >
      TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you
      fold
      in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains a
      table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging. on
      many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance i've
      had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures
      are
      accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a
      nice clean structure to work with.
      >
      ++ mcs
      >
      >

      Comment

      • Mark C. Stock

        #4
        Re: table API


        "bdj" <B.D.Jensen@gmx .netwrote in message
        news:41c0988c$0 $286$edfadb0f@d read11.news.tel e.dk...
        | Hi!
        | But what about performance when you have to manipulate more than one row
        | quickly?
        | Greetings
        | Bjørn
        | "Mark C. Stock" <mcstockX@Xenqu ery .comskrev i en meddelelse
        | news:apOdnWPwar UfvV3cRVn-rg@comcast.com. ..
        | >
        | "bdj" <B.D.Jensen@gmx .netwrote in message
        | news:41bf3ce8$0 $281$edfadb0f@d read11.news.tel e.dk...
        | | Hello!
        | | With Designer (and other tools) you can generate table-API's.
        | |
        | | When is a good idea to use it? I assume that it only make sense when
        | have
        | to
        | | modify an single row by an
        | | Forms/Report or other end-user-application (for example
        | web-interfaces) -
        | | right?
        | |
        | | Where to read more about it?
        | |
        | | Greetings
        | | Bjørn
        | |
        | |
        | >
        | i've come to be quite an advocate of TAPI's the more applications i've
        had
        | to maintain
        | >
        | TAPI's generated by tools are of course very rudimentary -- but as you
        | fold
        | in appropriate business rules, having a single procedure that maintains
        a
        | table greatly simplifies maintenance and development -- and debugging.
        on
        | many projects that i've been called in on to support/maintain/enhance
        i've
        | had to spend most of my time searching code to find out what procedures
        | are
        | accessing a certain table. if it's all in a single package, you've got a
        | nice clean structure to work with.
        | >
        | ++ mcs
        | >
        | >
        |
        |

        not an issue -- you just write the appropriate procedure/function that
        manipulates the appropriate rows

        ++ mcs


        Comment

        Working...