system tablespace

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gecho

    system tablespace

    New to oracle, but I'm coming from the sybase side.

    I took over one of our oracle production databases (1.5 Tb) while the
    regular dba is out. I got errors (unable to extend temp segment) for two
    user tablespaces which I took care of by adding a datafile to each. While
    reviewing the other tablespaces, I was surprised to see the system
    tablespace at 99%. I checked with app folks. No new
    objects were added accidentally to it. I panicked and resized the
    system tablespace by an additional 33%. Upon review, I forgot to notice
    that the system tablespace was set to autoextend. My question is this:
    even with the autoextend option set, is there a performance hit or crash
    potential by not resizing the system (or any other) tablespace before it
    hits 100%? On the sybase side, I take care of the logical devices before
    it reaches 85%.

    ~newbie appreciates any comments
    thanks,
    gecho
  • Mark D Powell

    #2
    Re: system tablespace

    gecho <gecho@hawaii.r r.comwrote in message news:<pan.2004. 07.10.02.27.33. 733470@hawaii.r r.com>...
    New to oracle, but I'm coming from the sybase side.
    >
    I took over one of our oracle production databases (1.5 Tb) while the
    regular dba is out. I got errors (unable to extend temp segment) for two
    user tablespaces which I took care of by adding a datafile to each. While
    reviewing the other tablespaces, I was surprised to see the system
    tablespace at 99%. I checked with app folks. No new
    objects were added accidentally to it. I panicked and resized the
    system tablespace by an additional 33%. Upon review, I forgot to notice
    that the system tablespace was set to autoextend. My question is this:
    even with the autoextend option set, is there a performance hit or crash
    potential by not resizing the system (or any other) tablespace before it
    hits 100%? On the sybase side, I take care of the logical devices before
    it reaches 85%.
    >
    ~newbie appreciates any comments
    thanks,
    gecho
    Gecho, by extending the system tablespace manually you eliminated the
    additional overhead that would have occurred when Oracle attempted to
    expand an object and then discovered that the file space necessary to
    hold the extent did not exist but could be obtained by expanding the
    file. Depending on what operation would have taken the extent that
    resulted in the file auto-extending this overhead may or may not have
    been noticable to the end user. But taking it early did not hurt and
    may have prevented a performance hit.

    IMHO -- Mark D Powell --

    Comment

    Working...