Just received vista business on a laptop from dell.
For delvelopment am using vistual studio .net 1.1 but have always (
2000 , xp)
had to vistual studio .net 1.0 first.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Why do you have to install .NET 1.0 first? It is not a requirement for .NET
1.1.
"jay widman" <guest@unknow n-email.comwrote in message
news:c0cebb7307 5a8ea1a68148ed2 6d4e10a@nntp-gateway.com...
>
Just received vista business on a laptop from dell.
For delvelopment am using vistual studio .net 1.1 but have always (
2000 , xp)
had to vistual studio .net 1.0 first.
Does anyone have any ideas?
>
thanks in advance
jay widman
>
>
--
jay widman
1.0 does not specify Vista in the system requirements, but 1.1 does. I
would go straight to that, if your visual studio version is supported on
Vista.
"Scott M." <s-mar@nospam.nosp amwrote in message
news:u6oNOIcHJH A.3668@TK2MSFTN GP02.phx.gbl...
Why do you have to install .NET 1.0 first? It is not a requirement for
.NET 1.1.
>
>
"jay widman" <guest@unknow n-email.comwrote in message
news:c0cebb7307 5a8ea1a68148ed2 6d4e10a@nntp-gateway.com...
>>
>Just received vista business on a laptop from dell.
>For delvelopment am using vistual studio .net 1.1 but have always (
>2000 , xp)
>had to vistual studio .net 1.0 first.
>Does anyone have any ideas?
>>
>thanks in advance
>jay widman
>>
>>
>--
>jay widman
On 2008-09-23, Family Tree Mike <FamilyTreeMike @ThisOldHouse.c omwrote:
1.0 does not specify Vista in the system requirements, but 1.1 does. I
would go straight to that, if your visual studio version is supported on
Vista.
>
I don't believe any version of VS prior to VS2005 is supported on Vista. The
runtimes are, but the IDE is not.
Comment