Can this cross-fade be improved?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Charles Packer
    #1

    Can this cross-fade be improved?

    In these Javascript-driven time-lapse
    "movies" ...
    Foliage time-lapse project
    http://cpacker.org/trees

    can the cross-fade be improved? I was grateful to be able
    to find the script on the Web at
    slayeroffice | code | image cross fade redux
    http://slayeroffice.com/code/imageCrossFade/xfade2.html

    I used it as is, for example at
    http://cpacker.org/trees/arbviewa/xfade2.js

    since the timing turned out to be
    about what I wanted -- one image per second.
    However, there is a brightness dip between images.
    Can the transition be made smoother?

    --
    Charles Packer
    What News?
    http://cpacker.org/whatnews

    mailboxATcpacke r.org
    Tags: None
    • Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
      #2
      Re: Can this cross-fade be improved?

      Charles Packer wrote:
      In these Javascript-driven time-lapse
      "movies" ...
      http://cpacker.org/trees
      404-compliant.


      PointedEars
      --
      Use any version of Microsoft Frontpage to create your site.
      (This won't prevent people from viewing your source, but no one
      will want to steal it.)
      -- from <http://www.vortex-webdesign.com/help/hidesource.htm>

        Comment

        • Charles Packer
          #3
          Re: Can this cross-fade be improved?

          On Jul 23, 2:16 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@we b.de>
          wrote:
          404-compliant.
          ....means something in German?

          --
          Charles Packer
          What News?
          http://cpacker.org/whatnews

          mailboxATcpacke r.org

            Comment

            • Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
              #4
              Re: Can this cross-fade be improved?

              Charles Packer wrote:
              Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
              >404-compliant.
              >
              ...means something in German?
              It means something in English (check the Jargon File). But apparently your
              Web site was only temporarily not available.


              PointedEars
              --
              realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
              evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
              madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
              -- Bjoern Hoehrmann

                Comment

                • Charles Packer
                  #5
                  Re: Can this cross-fade be improved?

                  On Jul 24, 6:33 pm, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedE...@we b.de>
                  wrote:
                  Charles Packer wrote:
                  Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
                  404-compliant.
                  >
                  ...means something in German?
                  >
                  It means something in English (check the Jargon File).  But apparently your
                  Web site was only temporarily not available.
                  Yes, my Web hosting provider apparently has been having some problems.

                  Since I posted, I've been experimenting with the opacity parameters of
                  the script
                  and changing the hard-coded value 1000 to something else.
                  These changes vary the timing between images and the amount of
                  dimming,
                  but they're not independent and it's some kind of crazy recursive
                  algorithm that demands more careful inspection.

                  --
                  Charles Packer
                  What News?
                  http://cpacker.org/whatnews

                  mailboxATcpacke r.org

                    Comment

                    Previous template Next
                    Working...