Re: Lynx, Links, and ELinks

[Grant]

On 16 Oct 2008 21:55:42 GMT, ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote:

>Carl <carl@never.com writes:

>>How many of the web developers here make their
>>sites accessible through text based browsers,

>
A web sites is accessible to /any/ web client
(otherwise it is not a web site).
>
When some people create sites that are only accessible with a
subset of web clients, they usually make an /extra effort/
(by not only using HTML, but additiional languages and plug-ins).
>
Web sites are not /made/ accessible.
>
Web sites /are/ accessible.

Crap, you've obviously not visited a site that renders as "[plug-in]"

...not accessible at all.

Grant.
--

http://bugsplatter.id.au

[Guy Macon]

Re: Lynx, Links, and ELinks




Grant wrote:

>
>Stefan Ram wrote:
>

>>Carl <carl@never.com writes:

>

>>>How many of the web developers here make their
>>>sites accessible through text based browsers,

>>
> A web sites is accessible to /any/ web client
> (otherwise it is not a web site).
>>
> When some people create sites that are only accessible with a
> subset of web clients, they usually make an /extra effort/
> (by not only using HTML, but additiional languages and plug-ins).
>>
> Web sites are not /made/ accessible.
>>
> Web sites /are/ accessible.

>
>Crap, you've obviously not visited a site that renders as "[plug-in]"
>
>..not accessible at all.

Grant is correct. Stefan should have specified that he was only
talking about that subset of websites that are written in HTML.


--
Guy Macon
<http://www.GuyMacon.co m/>