On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 07:23:07 -0700 (PDT), Prisoner at War wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:44 pm, Gregor Kofler wrote:
>And you should know the difference between "font-family:
>Arial, Verdana;" and "font-family: Arial; font-family: Verdana;".
>Arial, Verdana;" and "font-family: Arial; font-family: Verdana;".
Actually, verdana and arial look extremely similar.
Also (and mostly), what Jonathan said.
>I could also point out, that you shouldn't quote signatures. But I
>suppose one has to be happy, that you're not top-posting.
>suppose one has to be happy, that you're not top-posting.
This is really bizarre -- why not quote signatures??? Very, very
strange rules...I mean, why do people have signatures to their posts
if they don't want their signatures quoted??
>
1) You've already got the attribution lines up at the top, so there's no
need to quote the sig, too.
2) Some people's sigs are rather long. Go look at threads with (a lot of)
posts from Jerry Stuckle in them. He often gets in very long back-and-forth
discussions with users of GoogleGroups, and GG doesn't automatically trim
sigs from replies, and GG users don't know any better, and Jerry's too lazy
(or something) to trim out previous sigs (or other irrelevant content), and
his sparring partners don't do it either. But other sigs, longer and
shorter, are unnecessary for quoting. We waste enough bandwidth already.
3) You're not commenting on the sig (well, except in the very rare case
that you *are*), so it should be trimmed like all of the other points to
which you are not directly replying.
I don't mind if you quote *my* signature, but nobody else (except maybe a
shark or two) will be too happy about it.
--
John
Read about the UIP: http://improve-usenet.org/
Leave a comment: