DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

[Pat]

Does anybody have any suggestions on DotNetNuke.
Is it easy to use and install?
Should I use it or not?

I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.

Thanks, Pat.

[Mike]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

Walk the other way. Don't bother using it
"Pat" <Pat@nospaml.co mwrote in message
news:uqjj9l9HJH A.1160@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...

Does anybody have any suggestions on DotNetNuke.
Is it easy to use and install?
Should I use it or not?
>
I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.
>
Thanks, Pat.
>
>
>
>

[Mark Rae [MVP]]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

"Pat" <Pat@nospaml.co mwrote in message
news:uqjj9l9HJH A.1160@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...

I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.

Avoid it like the plague.


--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP

http://www.markrae.net

[Brian Simmons]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

Without taking up too much of your time, could you give me a few highlights
as to: why?

I was just considering using DNN, but value your opinion as to why not to
use it.

Thanks,
Brian

"Mark Rae [MVP]" <mark@markNOSPA Mrae.netwrote in message
news:ev6BPc%23H JHA.3548@TK2MSF TNGP05.phx.gbl. ..

"Pat" <Pat@nospaml.co mwrote in message
news:uqjj9l9HJH A.1160@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...
>

>I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.

>
Avoid it like the plague.
>
>
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

[Mark Rae [MVP]]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

"Brian Simmons" <centraso@newsg roup.nospamwrot e in message
news:uTfJndBIJH A.788@TK2MSFTNG P06.phx.gbl...

[please don't top-post]

>>I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.

>>
>Avoid it like the plague.

>
Without taking up too much of your time, could you give me a few
highlights as to: why?
>
I was just considering using DNN, but value your opinion as to why not to
use it.

It's written in VB.NET.

It has a totally unnecessary 10-directory-deep application tree.

Cryptic default rewriting scheme and modification is not very
straightforward . The more often than not results in very low search engine
visibility.

Very awkward administration.

It's almost impossible to modify DNN without a huge amount of work.
Basically, if you want to deviate even slightly from the standard templates,
you're in trouble. You can spot a DNN site at 100 paces, just like you could
with a FrontPage site...

Etc.


--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP

http://www.markrae.net

[javad]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

i think DNN is best for use
i think it have very firendly interface for admin and very easu to manage
the content of your site
i think the library of it is very classic and have high level standard
i use it , and very enjoy it

"Mark Rae [MVP]" <mark@markNOSPA Mrae.netwrote in message
news:u20H%23oBI JHA.508@TK2MSFT NGP05.phx.gbl.. .

"Brian Simmons" <centraso@newsg roup.nospamwrot e in message
news:uTfJndBIJH A.788@TK2MSFTNG P06.phx.gbl...
>
[please don't top-post]
>

>>>I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.
>>>
>>Avoid it like the plague.

>>
>Without taking up too much of your time, could you give me a few
>highlights as to: why?
>>
>I was just considering using DNN, but value your opinion as to why not to
>use it.

>
It's written in VB.NET.
>
It has a totally unnecessary 10-directory-deep application tree.
>
Cryptic default rewriting scheme and modification is not very
straightforward . The more often than not results in very low search engine
visibility.
>
Very awkward administration.
>
It's almost impossible to modify DNN without a huge amount of work.
Basically, if you want to deviate even slightly from the standard
templates, you're in trouble. You can spot a DNN site at 100 paces, just
like you could with a FrontPage site...
>
Etc.
>
>
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

[javad]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

i think DNN is best for use
i think it have very firendly interface for admin and very easu to manage
the content of your site
i think the library of it is very classic and have high level standard
i use it , and very enjoy it

"Mark Rae [MVP]" <mark@markNOSPA Mrae.netwrote in message
news:u20H%23oBI JHA.508@TK2MSFT NGP05.phx.gbl.. .

"Brian Simmons" <centraso@newsg roup.nospamwrot e in message
news:uTfJndBIJH A.788@TK2MSFTNG P06.phx.gbl...
>
[please don't top-post]
>

>>>I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.
>>>
>>Avoid it like the plague.

>>
>Without taking up too much of your time, could you give me a few
>highlights as to: why?
>>
>I was just considering using DNN, but value your opinion as to why not to
>use it.

>
It's written in VB.NET.
>
It has a totally unnecessary 10-directory-deep application tree.
>
Cryptic default rewriting scheme and modification is not very
straightforward . The more often than not results in very low search engine
visibility.
>
Very awkward administration.
>
It's almost impossible to modify DNN without a huge amount of work.
Basically, if you want to deviate even slightly from the standard
templates, you're in trouble. You can spot a DNN site at 100 paces, just
like you could with a FrontPage site...
>
Etc.
>
>
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

[Pat]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

Thanks everybody for your comments.

Pat.

"Pat" <Pat@nospaml.co mwrote in message
news:uqjj9l9HJH A.1160@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...

Does anybody have any suggestions on DotNetNuke.
Is it easy to use and install?
Should I use it or not?
>
I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.
>
Thanks, Pat.
>
>
>
>

[Alexey Smirnov]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

On Sep 30, 10:44 pm, "Pat" <P...@nospaml.c omwrote:

Thanks everybody for your comments.
>
Pat.
>
"Pat" <P...@nospaml.c omwrote in message
>
news:uqjj9l9HJH A.1160@TK2MSFTN GP05.phx.gbl...
>

Does anybody have any suggestions on DotNetNuke.
Is it easy to use and install?
Should I use it or not?

>

I'll appreciate if I get any suggestion on it.

>

Thanks, Pat.

I think it's a matter of taste... I just recently saw an example of a
corporate sites based on DNN (tarkettna.com, azrock.com). I think I
will never use it myself, but take a look at the links, you can do a
lot with it

[Mark Rae [MVP]]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

"Alexey Smirnov" <alexey.smirnov @gmail.comwrote in message
news:2abcfc42-4f2f-4269-b35c-bb1be81c8286@v2 8g2000hsv.googl egroups.com...

I think it's a matter of taste... I just recently saw an example of a
corporate sites based on DNN (tarkettna.com, azrock.com). I think I
will never use it myself, but take a look at the links, you can do a
lot with it

Like I said, you can spot a DNN site at 100 paces...


--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP

http://www.markrae.net

[=?Utf-8?B?Sml0ZW5kcmE=?=]

Re: DotNetNuke - Any suggestions?

i have many years of experience to work with CMS as a Programmer, What i
found DNN is the best that provides very strong backbone library structure
with exposing our customization with enhancement. I found most of DNN
clients are more then happy by fully editable and configurable CMS with
desired custom modules too. I really appreciate a effort that provided behind
development of DNN team.

Surely, i will suggest DNN for Content Management System

Thanks,
Jitendra

"Mark Rae [MVP]" wrote:

"Alexey Smirnov" <alexey.smirnov @gmail.comwrote in message
news:2abcfc42-4f2f-4269-b35c-bb1be81c8286@v2 8g2000hsv.googl egroups.com...
>

I think it's a matter of taste... I just recently saw an example of a
corporate sites based on DNN (tarkettna.com, azrock.com). I think I
will never use it myself, but take a look at the links, you can do a
lot with it

>
Like I said, you can spot a DNN site at 100 paces...
>
>
--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP

http://www.markrae.net

>
>