template non type parameters in operator overloaded function

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aravindap

    template non type parameters in operator overloaded function

    Hi All,
    I am trying to do following things,

    #include <iostream>

    using namespace std;
    class x{

    ------- // member variables

    public:

    template <int flag>
    void setFlag ();

    template <int id>
    void operator+= (x& obj1);
    }

    template <int flag>
    void x::setFlag(){ cout << " inside setFlag " << flag << endl; }

    template <int id>
    void x::operator+=(x & obj1){ cout << "inside +=" << id << endl; }

    int main()
    {
    x o1, o2;
    o1.setFlag <1();
    o1 += <22>o2 ; /* Line no 3 */
    o1.operator+= <22(o2); /* Line no 4 */
    }

    Problem
    ========
    In line no 3 I am getting " error: expected primary-expression before
    '<' token"
    If i modify line 3 as line no 4, no issues. I am getting proper
    output.
    Please let me know how my implementation should be to have something
    similar to line 3 , I dont want to have like one in line no 4.

    Thanks and Regards,
    Aravind.
  • Gianni Mariani

    #2
    Re: template non type parameters in operator overloaded function

    aravindap wrote:
    ....
    Please let me know how my implementation should be to have something
    similar to line 3 , I dont want to have like one in line no 4.
    I think you're out of luck. I don't think C++ supports the line 3 syntax.

    Comment

    • aravindap

      #3
      Re: template non type parameters in operator overloaded function

      On Oct 24, 12:35 am, Gianni Mariani <gi4nos...@mari ani.wswrote:
      aravindapwrote:
      >
      ...
      >
      Please let me know how my implementation should be to have something
      similar to line 3 , I dont want to have like one in line no 4.
      >
      I think you're out of luck. I don't think C++ supports the line 3 syntax.
      Thanks Gianni, for now I will settle for line no 4 syntax, is it
      possible for us to suggest people to include such syntax ?

      Comment

      Working...