setsockopt in windows

[asit]

In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...

if(setsockopt(s ockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int)) ==
-1)
{
perror("setsock opt error");
}

In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

[Ian Collins]

Re: setsockopt in windows

asit wrote:

In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...
>
if(setsockopt(s ockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int)) ==
-1)
{
perror("setsock opt error");
}
>
In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

Have you tried searching for "setsockopt winsock"?

Failing that, a windows programming group would be a good place to ask.

--
Ian Collins.

[CBFalconer]

Re: setsockopt in windows

asit wrote:

>
In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...
>
if(setsockopt(s ockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int))
== -1)
{
perror("setsock opt error");
}
>
In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

There is no such function in standard C. This is off-topic on
c.l.c. Find a newsgroup that deals with your system, which appears
to be Windows. The result will not be portable.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
Try the download section.

[Ian Collins]

Re: setsockopt in windows

CBFalconer wrote:

asit wrote:

>In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
>equivalent code...
>>
>if(setsockopt( sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int))
>== -1)
>{
> perror("setsock opt error");
>}
>>
>In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
>function !!!!!

>
There is no such function in standard C. This is off-topic on
c.l.c. Find a newsgroup that deals with your system, which appears
to be Windows. The result will not be portable.
>

Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

--
Ian Collins.

[Antoninus Twink]

Re: setsockopt in windows

On 6 Oct 2008 at 21:44, Ian Collins wrote:

CBFalconer wrote:

[the usual]

Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

Since when did that ever stop CBF making a nuisance of himself?

[CBFalconer]

Re: setsockopt in windows

Ian Collins wrote:

CBFalconer wrote:

>asit wrote:
>>

>>In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its
>>winsock equivalent code...
>>>
>>if(setsockopt (sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int))
>> == -1)
>>{
>> perror("setsock opt error");
>>}
>>>
>>In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix
>>setsockopt( ) function !!!!!

>>
>There is no such function in standard C. This is off-topic on
>c.l.c. Find a newsgroup that deals with your system, which appears
>to be Windows. The result will not be portable.

>
Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

Yes, but not on my screen before I read and answered. Besides,
your answer left topicality somewhat in doubt (IMO).

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home .att.net>
Try the download section.

[Ian Collins]

Re: setsockopt in windows

CBFalconer wrote:

Ian Collins wrote:

>Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

>
Yes, but not on my screen before I read and answered. Besides,
your answer left topicality somewhat in doubt (IMO).
>

You could save your self a lot of time by reading ahead before replying.
A threading newsreader would also help.

--
Ian Collins.

[Peter Nilsson]

Re: setsockopt in windows

Ian Collins <ian-n...@hotmail.co mwrote:

CBFalconer wrote:

There is no such function in standard C. ...

>
Didn't I say that ... over 12 hours ago?

Not the first bit, no.

--
Peter