In another thread, I was asked about the differences between lcc as
distributed in the site of Dave Hanson, and lcc-win.
I pointed out to the differences, but re-reading my answer it looks
very harsh as if I was implying that lcc is not a good software.
I would like to emphasize here that the objectives of the original lcc
and lcc-win are quite different, and it wasn't my intention at all to
imply that lcc is not a very good compiler.
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
distributed in the site of Dave Hanson, and lcc-win.
I pointed out to the differences, but re-reading my answer it looks
very harsh as if I was implying that lcc is not a good software.
I would like to emphasize here that the objectives of the original lcc
and lcc-win are quite different, and it wasn't my intention at all to
imply that lcc is not a very good compiler.
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
