Thanks a lot for the answer so far. I know that it is pointless to
have a one-element array, it should become an array (or pointer to the
first of n) of syms afterwards. My specific question is if I can now
somehow "compact" this 4 lines:
in one "line". I will have a lot syms (approx 128) where each will
have approximately 2^7 rows with width 2, which will cause a lot
unnecessary generation of static variables i'll never use. So for
example "static unsigned int vector = {1,2}; causes "vector" to store
the address of the first element. But with which language construct/
feature can i get out of the expression "{1,2}" the address of the
first element without the detour of a variable named vector? Cause I
don't really need it. It is enough if it is stored in the first
element of my sym datatype.
Thanks again,
Thorsten
have a one-element array, it should become an array (or pointer to the
first of n) of syms afterwards. My specific question is if I can now
somehow "compact" this 4 lines:
static unsigned int vector = {1, 2};
static unsigned int array = {{1, 2}, {1,2}, {1,2}};
static unsigned int *rows[] = {array, array+1, array+2};
static sym testdata = { vector, rows, 3);
static unsigned int array = {{1, 2}, {1,2}, {1,2}};
static unsigned int *rows[] = {array, array+1, array+2};
static sym testdata = { vector, rows, 3);
have approximately 2^7 rows with width 2, which will cause a lot
unnecessary generation of static variables i'll never use. So for
example "static unsigned int vector = {1,2}; causes "vector" to store
the address of the first element. But with which language construct/
feature can i get out of the expression "{1,2}" the address of the
first element without the detour of a variable named vector? Cause I
don't really need it. It is enough if it is stored in the first
element of my sym datatype.
Thanks again,
Thorsten