is this valid c++?

[Simon]

Hi,

If I have the following :

struct sA
{
double A1;
double A2;
};

struct sB
{
double B1;
long B2;
};

struct sC : sA, sB
{
double C1;
double C2;
};

//
// main app
sC myC = ... // set some values;
sA myA = (sA)myC;
sB myB = (sB)myB;

//
//

When I do it on my compiler, VS2009 it works.

In other word the value of myA has the values from myC simply by casting.
And the same for myB getting the right values from myC by casting.

But I doubt there are any rules in the standard that say that when you cast
like that you must copy the right values.

If this is not 'standard' what would be the better way of getting sA and sB
from sC

Many thanks

Simon

[peter koch]

Re: is this valid c++?

On 19 Sep., 20:00, "Simon" <spambuc...@exa mple.comwrote:

Hi,
>
If I have the following :
>
struct sA
{
  double A1;
  double A2;
>
};
>
struct sB
{
  double B1;
  long B2;
>
};
>
struct sC :  sA, sB
{
  double C1;
  double C2;
>
};
>
//
// main app
sC myC = ... // set some values;
sA myA = (sA)myC;
sB myB = (sB)myB;
>
//
//
>
When I do it on my compiler, VS2009 it works.
>
In other word the value of myA has the values from myC simply by casting.
And the same for myB getting the right values from myC by casting.

You don't need the cast - remove it.

>
But I doubt there are any rules in the standard that say that when you cast
like that you must copy the right values.

There is not, but there are good rules that tell you to avoid casts
and - equally important - "never" to use C-style casts. C++ has
defined safer and better casts - use those instead.

/Peter

[James Kanze]

Re: is this valid c++?

On Sep 19, 8:00 pm, "Simon" <spambuc...@exa mple.comwrote:

If I have the following :

struct sA
{
double A1;
double A2;
};

struct sB
{
double B1;
long B2;
};

struct sC : sA, sB
{
double C1;
double C2;
};

//
// main app
sC myC = ... // set some values;
sA myA = (sA)myC;
sB myB = (sB)myB;

//
//

When I do it on my compiler, VS2009 it works.

One would hope so.

In other word the value of myA has the values from myC simply
by casting. And the same for myB getting the right values
from myC by casting.

You don't even need the casts. An sC isA sA and an sB.

But I doubt there are any rules in the standard that say that
when you cast like that you must copy the right values.

Of course there are. It's more or less one of the basics of
inheritance.

--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:james.kan ze@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientier ter Datenverarbeitu ng
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34

[blargg]

Re: is this valid c++?

In article
<ef909c34-f805-4b42-839b-81f80cafc147@z6 6g2000hsc.googl egroups.com>, James
Kanze <james.kanze@gm ail.comwrote:

On Sep 19, 8:00 pm, "Simon" <spambuc...@exa mple.comwrote:

If I have the following :

>

struct sA
{
double A1;
double A2;
};

>

struct sB
{
double B1;
long B2;
};

>

struct sC : sA, sB
{
double C1;
double C2;
};

>

//
// main app
sC myC = ... // set some values;
sA myA = (sA)myC;
sB myB = (sB)myB;

>

//
//

>

When I do it on my compiler, VS2009 it works.

>
One would hope so.

Except that the last line invokes undefined behavior by assigning the
uninitialized myB to itself.

[Simon]

Re: is this valid c++?

>>

//
//

>>

When I do it on my compiler, VS2009 it works.

>>
>One would hope so.

>
Except that the last line invokes undefined behavior by assigning the
uninitialized myB to itself.

oops, that was a typo
it should say

....
sC myC = ... // set some values;
sA myA = (sA)myC;
sB myB = (sB)myC;

Thanks

Simon